A randomized sham-controlled trial on the effects of dual-tDCS "during" physical therapy on lower limb performance in sub-acute stroke and a comparison to the previous study using a "before" stimulation protocol

被引:7
作者
Klomjai, Wanalee [1 ,2 ]
Aneksan, Benchaporn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Phys Therapy, Neuro Elect Stimulat Lab NeuE, Salaya 73170, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Phys Therapy, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Rd, Salaya 73170, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
关键词
Dual-tDCS; Lower limb; Stroke; Physical therapy; Timing effect; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; OVARIAN HORMONES; SINGLE SESSION; FOLLOW-UP; REHABILITATION; COMORBIDITY; RECOVERY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13102-022-00463-9
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Dual-transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to rebalance the cortical excitability of both hemispheres following unilateral-stroke. Our previous study showed a positive effect from a single-session of dual-tDCS applied before physical therapy (PT) on lower limb performance. However, it is still undetermined if other timings of brain stimulation (i.e., during motor practice) induce better effects. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a single-session of dual-tDCS "during" PT on lower limb performance in sub-acute stroke and then compare the results with our previous data using a "before" stimulation paradigm. Method For the current "during" protocol, 19 participants were participated in a randomized sham-controlled crossover trial. Dual-tDCS over the M1 of both cortices (2 mA) was applied during the first 20 min of PT. The Timed Up and Go and Five-Times-Sit-To-Stand tests were assessed at pre- and post-intervention and 1-week follow-up. Then, data from the current study were compared with those of the previous "before" study performed in a different group of 19 subjects. Both studies were compared by the difference of mean changes from the baseline. Results Dual-tDCS "during" PT and the sham group did not significantly improve lower limb performance. By comparing with the previous data, performance in the "before" group was significantly greater than in the "during" and sham groups at post-intervention, while at follow-up the "before" group had better improvement than sham, but not greater than the "during" group. Conclusion A single-session of dual-tDCS during PT induced no additional advantage on lower limb performance. The "before" group seemed to induce better acute effects; however, the benefits of the after-effects on motor learning for both stimulation protocols were probably not different. Trial registration Current randomized controlled trials was prospectively registered at the clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT04051671. The date of registration was 09/08/2019.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three scales for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke
    Alghadir, Ahmad H.
    Al-Eisa, Einas S.
    Anwer, Shahnawaz
    Sarkar, Bibhuti
    [J]. BMC NEUROLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [2] Modulating Motor Learning through Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation: An Integrative View
    Ammann, Claudia
    Spampinato, Danny
    Marquez-Ruiz, Javier
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [3] How to identify potential fallers in a stroke unit:: Validity indexes of four test methods
    Andersson, ÅG
    Kamwendo, K
    Seiger, Å
    Appelros, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [4] Effects of different montages of transcranial direct current stimulation on the risk of falls and lower limb function after stroke
    Andrade, Suellen Marinho
    de Almeida Ferreira, Jose Jamacy
    Rufino, Thatiana Silva
    Medeiros, Germana
    Brito, Jader Duarte
    da Silva, Michele Alexandre
    Moreira, Raquel de Negreiros
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 39 (12) : 1037 - 1043
  • [5] Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms shape cortical plasticity in humans
    Antal, Andrea
    Chaieb, Leila
    Moliadze, Vera
    Monte-Silva, Katia
    Poreisz, Csaba
    Thirugnanasambandam, Nivethida
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Shoukier, Moneef
    Ludwig, Harald
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2010, 3 (04) : 230 - 237
  • [6] Determinants of length of stay in stroke patients: a geriatric rehabilitation unit experience
    Atalay, Ayce
    Turhan, Nur
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2009, 32 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [7] Different Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper and Lower Limb Recovery of Stroke Patients with Motor Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis
    Bai, Xi
    Guo, Zhiwei
    He, Lin
    Ren, Long
    McClure, Morgan A.
    Mu, Qiwen
    [J]. NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2019, 2019
  • [8] Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training?
    Cabral, Maria E.
    Baltar, Adriana
    Borba, Rebeka
    Galvao, Silvana
    Santos, Luciana
    Fregni, Felipe
    Monte-Silva, Katia
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2015, 26 (11) : 618 - 622
  • [9] Enhancement of Cortical Excitability and Lower Limb Motor Function in Patients With Stroke by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Chang, Min Cheol
    Kim, Dae Yul
    Park, Dae Hwan
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (03) : 561 - 566
  • [10] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Studies Exhibit a Dose-Response Relationship
    Chhatbar, Pratik Y.
    Ramakrishnan, Viswanathan
    Kautz, Steven
    George, Mark S.
    Adams, Robert J.
    Feng, Wuwei
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 16 - 26