Equine on-farm welfare assessment: a review of animal-based indicators

被引:62
作者
Costa, E. Dalla [1 ]
Murray, L. [1 ]
Dai, F. [1 ]
Canali, E. [1 ]
Minero, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Vet & Sanita Pubbl, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
animal-based indicator; animal welfare; donkey welfare; equine welfare; horse welfare; on-farm welfare assessment protocol; QUALITATIVE BEHAVIORAL-ASSESSMENT; SKIN TENT TEST; WORKING HORSES; DOMESTIC HORSE; BODY CONDITION; RISK-FACTORS; PAIN SCALE; HEART-RATE; DONKEYS; TEMPERAMENT;
D O I
10.7120/09627286.23.3.323
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The adaptability of horses and donkeys to different types of activity has seen the European equine industry become an important economic sector, giving rise to increasing concern regarding equine welfare. As part of the AWIN (Animal Welfare Indicators) project, this review focuses on scientific literature to find potential animal-based welfare indicators - the initial step in developing a valid, reliable and feasible on-farm welfare assessment protocol for equines. Forty-nine indicators were considered and classified in accordance with the four Principles and twelve Criteria developed by Welfare Quality (R). Only practical indicators specifically for on-farm use were included, those requiring the use of specific instruments or laboratory analysis were excluded. Academic scientists, partners and collaborators of the AWIN project, discussed and agreed on validity, reliability, on-farm feasibility and acceptance by farmers for each indicator. Some aspects of equine welfare have been thoroughly investigated and appear to have indicators ready for on-farm use (eg 'absence of prolonged hunger', 'absence of injuries and diseases'). On the other hand, a lack of animal-based measures were identified for other Criteria such as 'absence of pain' and 'positive emotional state'. Ongoing research within the AWIN project has begun exploring some of the aforementioned Criteria - these preliminary results of promising indicators have been included (eg Horse Grimace Scale and Qualitative Behaviour Assessment). Further research should address the validity and reliability of indicators, such as human-animal relationship tests and signs of cold stress. As well as for working equines, the development and application of a welfare assessment protocol could be the first step for enhancing on-farm equine welfare.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 341
页数:19
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Acock AC., 2018, A gentle introduction to stata, V6
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EFSA J, DOI DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2551
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, EQUINE VET J
[4]   Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies [J].
Ashley, FH ;
Waterman-Pearson, AE ;
Whay, HR .
EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 37 (06) :565-575
[5]  
Asknes F, 2012, P 46 C INT SOC APPL, P236
[6]   Risk factors associated with behavioural disorders of crib-biting, weaving and box-walking in Swiss horses [J].
Bachmann, I ;
Audigé, L ;
Stauffacher, M .
EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 35 (02) :158-163
[7]   The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal well-being [J].
Blokhuis, H. J. ;
Veissier, I. ;
Miele, M. ;
Jones, B. .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 60 (03) :129-140
[8]   Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows [J].
Boe, KE ;
Færevik, G .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (03) :175-190
[9]   Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare [J].
Boissy, Alain ;
Manteuffel, Gerhard ;
Jensen, Margit Bak ;
Moe, Randi Oppennann ;
Spruijt, Berry ;
Keeling, Linda J. ;
Winckler, Christoph ;
Forkman, Bjoern ;
Dimitrov, Ivan ;
Langbein, Jan ;
Bakken, Morten ;
Veissier, Isabelle ;
Aubert, Amaud .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2007, 92 (03) :375-397
[10]  
Bonaita C, 2012, 8 INT SOC EQ SCI C 1, P94