Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

被引:740
|
作者
Silver, Daniel P.
Richardson, Andrea L.
Eklund, Aron C.
Wang, Zhigang C.
Szallasi, Zoltan
Li, Qiyuan
Juul, Nicolai
Leong, Chee-Onn
Calogrias, Diana
Buraimoh, Ayodele
Fatima, Aquila
Gelman, Rebecca S.
Ryan, Paula D.
Tung, Nadine M.
De Nicolo, Arcangela
Ganesan, Shridar
Miron, Alexander
Colin, Christian
Sgroi, Dennis C.
Ellisen, Leif W.
Winer, Eric P.
Garber, Judy E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STATUS; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; BASAL-LIKE; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; EXPRESSION PROFILES; BRCA1; MUTATIONS; P53; SURVIVAL; TUMORS; CHEMOSENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4725
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent not used routinely for breast cancer treatment. As a DNA cross-linking agent, cisplatin may be effective treatment for hereditary BRCA1-mutated breast cancers. Because sporadic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and BRCA1-associated breast cancer share features suggesting common pathogenesis, we conducted a neoadjuvant trial of cisplatin in TNBC and explored specific biomarkers to identify predictors of response. Patients and Methods Twenty-eight women with stage II or III breast cancers lacking estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2/Neu (TNBC) were enrolled and treated with four cycles of cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days. After definitive surgery, patients received standard adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy per their treating physicians. Clinical and pathologic treatment response were assessed, and pretreatment tumor samples were evaluated for selected biomarkers. Results Six (22%) of 28 patients achieved pathologic complete responses, including both patients with BRCA1 germline mutations; 18 (64%) patients had a clinical complete or partial response. Fourteen (50%) patients showed good pathologic responses (Miller-Payne score of 3, 4, or 5), 10 had minor responses (Miller-Payne score of 1 or 2), and four (14%) progressed. All TNBCs clustered with reference basal-like tumors by hierarchical clustering. Factors associated with good cisplatin response include young age (P = .001), low BRCA1 mRNA expression (P = .03), BRCA1 promoter methylation (P = .04), p53 nonsense or frameshift mutations (P = .01), and a gene expression signature of E2F3 activation (P = .03). Conclusion Single-agent cisplatin induced response in a subset of patients with TNBC. Decreased BRCA1 expression may identify subsets of TNBCs that are cisplatin sensitive. Other biomarkers show promise in predicting cisplatin response. J Clin Oncol 28: 1145-1153. (C) 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1153
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Implications of iNOS Levels in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Responding to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Jin, Zining
    Wang, Wenqian
    Jiang, Nan
    Zhang, Lei
    Li, Yiming
    Xu, Xiaoyin
    Cai, Shouliang
    Wei, Liang
    Liu, Xuhong
    Chen, Guanglei
    Zhou, Yizhen
    Liu, Cheng
    Li, Zhan
    Jin, Feng
    Chen, Bo
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [42] Cisplatin-resistant triple-negative breast cancer subtypes: multiple mechanisms of resistance
    Hill, David P.
    Harper, Akeena
    Malcolm, Joan
    McAndrews, Monica S.
    Mockus, Susan M.
    Patterson, Sara E.
    Reynolds, Timothy
    Baker, Erich J.
    Bult, Carol J.
    Chesler, Elissa J.
    Blake, Judith A.
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [43] Estimating mortality in women with triple-negative breast cancer: The 'ESTIMATE triple-negative' tool
    Leone, Jose P.
    Graham, Noah
    Leone, Julieta
    Tolaney, Sara M.
    Leone, Bernardo A.
    Freedman, Rachel A.
    Hassett, Michael J.
    Vallejo, Carlos T.
    Winer, Eric P.
    Lin, Nancy U.
    Tayob, Nabihah
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 189
  • [44] Pathological Response in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cohort Treated with Neoadjuvant Carboplatin and Docetaxel According to Lehmann's Refined Classification
    Echavarria, Isabel
    Lopez-Tarruella, Sara
    Picornell, Antoni
    Angel Garcia-Saenz, Jose
    Jerez, Yolanda
    Hoadley, Katherine
    Gomez, Henry L.
    Moreno, Fernando
    Del Monte-Millan, Maria
    Marquez-Rodas, Ivan
    Alvarez, Enrique
    Ramos-Medina, Rocio
    Gayarre, Javier
    Massarrah, Tatiana
    Ocana, Inmaculada
    Cebollero, Maria
    Fuentes, Hugo
    Barnadas, Agusti
    Isabel Ballesteros, Ana
    Bohn, Uriel
    Perou, Charles M.
    Martin, Miguel
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (08) : 1845 - 1852
  • [45] Response and prognosis of taxanes and anthracyclines neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Wu, Jiannan
    Li, Shunrong
    Jia, Weijuan
    Su, Fengxi
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 137 (10) : 1505 - 1510
  • [46] Two Hematological Markers Predicting the Efficacy and Prognosis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Lobaplatin Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Wang, Cheng
    Shi, Qiyun
    Zhang, Guozhi
    Wu, Xiujuan
    Yan, Wenting
    Wan, Andi
    Xiong, Siyi
    Yuan, Long
    Tian, Hao
    Ma, Dandan
    Jiang, Jun
    Qi, Xiaowei
    Zhang, Yi
    ONCOLOGIST, 2024, : e635 - e642
  • [47] Triple-negative Breast Cancer and Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
    Park, Youngjin
    Moriyama, Ayako
    Kitahara, Tomoaki
    Yoshida, Yutaka
    Urita, Tasuku
    Kato, Ryoji
    ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 12 (06) : 672 - 677
  • [48] Methylseleninic Acid Enhances Paclitaxel Efficacy for the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Qi, Yanfeng
    Fu, Xueqi
    Xiong, Zhenggang
    Zhang, Haitao
    Hill, Steven M.
    Rowan, Brian G.
    Dong, Yan
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [49] Therapeutic Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Tan, Antoinette R.
    Swain, Sandra M.
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (06) : 343 - 351
  • [50] Genomic Profiling in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Liedtke, Cornelia
    Bernemann, Christof
    Kiesel, Ludwig
    Rody, Achim
    BREAST CARE, 2013, 8 (06) : 408 - 413