On the dangers of model complexity without ecological justification in species distribution modeling

被引:65
作者
Bell, David M. [1 ]
Schlaepfer, Daniel R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Dept Bot, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[3] Univ Basel, Sect Conservat Biol, Dept Environm Sci, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Prediction; Extrapolation; Model fitting; Species distribution modeling; Transferability; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; VARIABLE SELECTION; RANGE; PREDICTION; RESPONSES; SPACE; VALIDATION; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.012
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Although biogeographic patterns are the product of complex ecological processes, the increasing complexity of correlative species distribution models (SDMs) is not always motivated by ecological theory, but by model fit. The validity of model projections, such as shifts in a species' climatic niche, becomes questionable particularly during extrapolations, such as for future no-analog climate conditions. To examine the effects of model complexity on SDM predictive performance, we fit statistical models of varying complexity to simulated species occurrence data arising from data-generating processes that assume differing degrees of distributional symmetry in environmental space, interaction effects, and coverage in climate space. Mismatches between data-generating processes and statistical models (i.e., different functional forms) led to poor predictive performance when extrapolating to new climate-space and greater variation in extrapolated predictions for overly complex models. In contrast, performance issues were not apparent when using independent evaluation data from the training region. These results draw into question the use of highly flexible models for prediction without ecological justification. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 59
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Fit-for-Purpose: Species Distribution Model Performance Depends on Evaluation Criteria - Dutch Hoverflies as a Case Study [J].
Aguirre-Gutierrez, Jesus ;
Carvalheiro, Luisa G. ;
Polce, Chiara ;
van Loon, E. Emiel ;
Raes, Niels ;
Reemer, Menno ;
Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05)
[2]   Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) [J].
Allouche, Omri ;
Tsoar, Asaf ;
Kadmon, Ronen .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (06) :1223-1232
[3]  
[Anonymous], VEGETATION ECOLOGY
[4]   Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Pearson, RG ;
Thuiller, W ;
Erhard, M .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2005, 11 (09) :1504-1513
[5]   Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches [J].
Austin, Mike .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (1-2) :1-19
[6]   Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale [J].
Austin, Mike P. ;
Van Niel, Kimberly P. .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2011, 38 (01) :1-8
[7]   Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling [J].
Austin, MP .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 157 (2-3) :101-118
[8]   A NEW MODEL FOR THE CONTINUUM CONCEPT [J].
AUSTIN, MP ;
SMITH, TM .
VEGETATIO, 1989, 83 (1-2) :35-47
[9]   CURRENT PROBLEMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS AND SPECIES RESPONSE CURVES IN RELATION TO CONTINUUM THEORY [J].
AUSTIN, MP ;
GAYWOOD, MJ .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (04) :473-482
[10]   Testing the predictive performance of distribution models [J].
Bahn, Volker ;
McGill, Brian J. .
OIKOS, 2013, 122 (03) :321-331