Life cycle assessment of a wooden single-family house in Sweden

被引:74
作者
Petrovic, Bojana [1 ,2 ]
Myhren, Jonn Are [1 ]
Zhang, Xingxing [1 ]
Wallhagen, Marita [2 ]
Eriksson, Ola [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalarna Univ, Dept Energy & Construct Technol, SE-79188 Falun, Sweden
[2] Gavle Univ, Dept Bldg Engn Energy Syst & Sustainabil Sci, SE-80176 Gavle, Sweden
关键词
Carbon dioxide equivalent emission; Environmental product declaration; Global warming potential; Life cycle assessment; Primary energy; Single-family house; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; EMBODIED ENERGY; CONSTRUCTION; LCA; BUILDINGS; CARBON; BALANCES; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.056
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
To understand the reasons behind the large environmental impact from buildings the whole life cycle needs to be considered. Therefore, this study evaluates the carbon dioxide emissions in all stages of a single-family house in Sweden from the production of building materials, followed by construction and user stages until the end-of-life of the building in a life cycle assessment (LCA). The methodology applied is attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) based on 'One Click LCA' tool and a calculated life span of 100 years. Global warming potential (GWP) and primary energy (PE) are calculated by using specific data from the case study, furthermore the data regarding building materials are based on Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). The results show that the selection of wood-based materials has a significantly lower impact on the carbon dioxide emissions in comparison with non-wood based materials. The total emissions for this single-family house in Sweden are 6 kg CO(2)e/m(2)/year. The production stage of building materials, including building systems and installations represent 30% of the total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, while the maintenance and replacement part represents 37%. However, energy use during the in-use stage of the house recorded lower environmental impact (21%) due to the Swedish electricity mix that is mostly based on energy sources with low carbon dioxide emissions. The water consumption, construction and the end-of-life stages have shown minor contribution to the buildings total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (12%). The primary energy indicator shows the largest share in the operational phase of the house.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The State of Food and Agriculture. Social Protection and Agriculture: Breaking the Cycle of Rural Poverty
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Climate Change: Mitigation of Climate Change, Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, EMB CARB REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision Makers
[5]   Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Baldassarri, Catia ;
Fthenakis, Vasilis .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 64 :73-89
[6]   Optimization of cement and fly ash particle sizes to produce sustainable concretes [J].
Bentz, Dale P. ;
Hansen, Andrew S. ;
Guynn, John M. .
CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2011, 33 (08) :824-831
[7]   IEA ESC annex 57 'evaluation of embodied energy and CO2eq for building construction' [J].
Birgisdottir, H. ;
Moncaster, A. ;
Wiberg, A. Houlihan ;
Chae, C. ;
Yokoyama, K. ;
Balouktsi, M. ;
Seo, S. ;
Oka, T. ;
Luetzkendorf, T. ;
Malmqvist, T. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 154 :72-80
[8]   Greenhouse gas balances in building construction:: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives [J].
Börjesson, P ;
Gustavsson, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) :575-588
[9]  
Boverket, 2018, CLIM DECL BUILD PROP
[10]  
Boverket, 2017, SWED NAT BOARD HOUS