COVID-19 and the opportunity to change the neoliberal agenda: evidence from socio-employment policy responses across Europe

被引:9
作者
Natali, David [1 ]
机构
[1] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Piazza Martiri Liberta 33, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; change; stability; ideas; employment; health care; pensions; neoliberalism;
D O I
10.1177/10242589221097231
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Much of the recent literature on the COVID-19 pandemic agrees on the uniqueness of this crisis. Assessments of the subsequent policy response in Europe diverge, however: while some see signs of policy change, others consider the empirical evidence to be inconclusive or, worse, consistent with a reinforcement of neoliberalism. The present article aims to contribute to that debate by providing a preliminary assessment of policy measures in the areas of health care, employment protection and pensions. Recent measures are viewed in terms of the neoliberal paradigm, which is used as a benchmark to identify any sign of innovation. While it is too early CO talk about a true paradigmatic transformation, the evidence collected from international datasets and official documents confirms that ideas and policy measures show signs of change. The article also suggests that the study of ideas is a promising field of enquiry with which to improve our understanding of the pandemic and its effects.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 30
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D, 2012, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V59, P85
[2]  
Andor Laszlo, 2020, Inter Econ, V55, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10272-020-0888-y
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The G20 Presidency 2017 at a glance, DOI [10.1787/pensionglance-2017-en, DOI 10.1787/PENSION_GLANCE-2017-EN, DOI 10.1787/PENSIONGLANCE-2017-EN]
[4]   A perfect storm: COVID-19 and the reorganisation of the German meat industry [J].
Ban, Cornel ;
Bohle, Dorothee ;
Naczyk, Marek .
TRANSFER-EUROPEAN REVIEW OF LABOUR AND RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (01) :101-118
[5]  
Ban Cornel., 2016, RULING IDEAS GLOBAL
[6]  
Baptista I., 2021, Social protection and inclusion policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis. An analysis of policies in 35 countries
[7]  
Blyth M, 2013, FOREIGN AFF, V92, P41
[8]   The Covid-19 economic crisis: dangerously unique [J].
Borio C. .
Business Economics, 2020, 55 (4) :181-190
[9]  
Buti M., 2021, CEPR POLICY INSIGHT, V109, P1
[10]   Long-term policy impacts of the coronavirus: normalization, adaptation, and acceleration in the post-COVID state [J].
Capano, Giliberto ;
Howlett, Michael ;
Jarvis, Darryl S. L. ;
Ramesh, M. .
POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 41 (01) :1-12