Research paradigms in medical education research

被引:292
作者
Bunniss, Suzanne [1 ]
Kelly, Diane R. [1 ]
机构
[1] NHS Educ Scotland, Dept Gen Practice Sect, Glasgow G60 5JP, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; DEBATE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Context The growing popularity of less familiar methodologies in medical education research, and the use of related data collection methods, has made it timely to revisit some basic assumptions regarding knowledge and evidence. Methods This paper outlines four major research paradigms and examines the methodological questions that underpin the development of knowledge through medical education research. Discussion This paper explores the rationale behind different research designs, and shows how the underlying research philosophy of a study can directly influence what is captured and reported. It also explores the interpretivist perspective in some depth to show how less familiar paradigm perspectives can provide useful insights to the complex questions generated by modern healthcare practice. Conclusions This paper concludes that the quality of research is defined by the integrity and transparency of the research philosophy and methods, rather than the superiority of any one paradigm. By demonstrating that different methodological approaches deliberately include and exclude different types of data, this paper highlights how competing knowledge philosophies have practical implications for the findings of a study.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 366
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Agar M.H., 2008, PROFESSIONAL STRANGE, V2nd
[2]   Understanding the debate on medical education research: A sociological perspective [J].
Albert, M .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (10) :948-954
[3]   Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research [J].
Albert, Mathieu ;
Laberge, Suzanne ;
Hodges, Brian D. ;
Regehr, Glenn ;
Lingard, Lorelei .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (12) :2520-2531
[4]   Research in medical education: Balancing service and science [J].
Albert, Mathieu ;
Hodges, Brian ;
Regehr, Glenn .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2007, 12 (01) :103-115
[5]  
Allen D., 1986, NURSING RES METHODOL, P23
[6]   Constructivism: A naturalistic methodology for nursing inquiry [J].
Appleton, JV ;
King, L .
ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 1997, 20 (02) :13-22
[7]  
Atkinson P., 2001, HDB ETHNOGRAPHY
[8]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[9]  
Berger P., 1966, The Social Construction of Reality
[10]   The science of improvement [J].
Berwick, Donald M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (10) :1182-1184