Studying Teachers' Sensemaking to Investigate Teachers' Responses to Professional Development Focused on New Standards

被引:182
作者
Allen, Carrie D. [1 ,2 ]
Penuel, William R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Educ, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
education policy; professional development; standards; science education; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; POLICY; KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN; REFORM;
D O I
10.1177/0022487114560646
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recent research on teacher professional development (PD) underscores the importance of the coherence of PD with standards, curriculum, and assessment. Teachers' judgments of the coherence of PD with larger system goals influence their decisions about what ideas and resources they appropriate from PD. Little research, however, has examined how teachers formulate these judgments and why teachers' judgments vary within the same system and for the same reform. In this article, we use organizational theory's concept of sensemaking to examine teachers' responses to PD related to the Next Generation Science Standards within two schools in the United States. Our study shows that teachers' perceptions of coherence emerge from interactions within PD, associated curriculum materials, and with colleagues and leaders in their schools. Some teachers, we found, were able to manage ambiguity, uncertainty, and perceived incoherence productively, while others foreclosed deep and sustained sensemaking. Our findings suggest the need for PD to engage teachers in sustained sensemaking activity around issues of perceived incoherence to bolster teachers' emergent understandings of standards and improve the likelihood of implementing instructional practices aligned to standards.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 149
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1921, SCHOOL SCI MATH, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1949-8594.1921.TB02161.X
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The management of innovation
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1924, CREATIVE EXPERIENCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MULTIPLE CASE STUDY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ADHOCRACY POWER CHAN
[7]  
Atkin J.M., 2003, Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy change
[8]  
Beijaard D., 1999, STUD EDUC EVAL, V25, P47, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0191-491X(99)00009-7
[9]  
Cobb P., 2003, Educational Researcher, V32, P13, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X032006013
[10]   Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy [J].
Coburn, CE .
EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2005, 19 (03) :476-509