Cenozoic uplift and erosion of the Norwegian Barents Shelf-A review

被引:43
作者
Lasabuda, Amando P. E. [1 ]
Johansen, Nora S. [2 ,9 ]
Laberg, Jan Sverre [1 ,3 ]
Faleide, Jan Inge [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Senger, Kim [1 ,6 ]
Rydningen, Tom Arne [3 ]
Patton, Henry [7 ]
Knutsen, Stig-Morten [1 ,8 ]
Hanssen, Alfred [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, ARCEx Res Ctr Arctic Petr Explorat, Dept Geosci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Geosci & Petr, Trondheim, Norway
[3] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Geosci, Tromso, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, CEED Ctr Earth Evolut & Dynam, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Ctr Svalbard UNIS, Dept Arctic Geol, Longyearbyen, Norway
[7] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, CAGE Ctr Arctic Gas Hydrate Environm & Climate, Dept Geosci, Tromso, Norway
[8] Norwegian Petr Directorate NPD, Harstad, Norway
[9] AkerBP, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Cenozoic; Uplift; Erosion; Barents Shelf; Tectonic; Glacial; TROUGH MOUTH FANS; SEA CONTINENTAL-MARGIN; LARGE IGNEOUS PROVINCE; ICE-SHEET; SEISMIC STRATIGRAPHY; SORVESTSNAGET BASIN; NORTH-ATLANTIC; BEAR-ISLAND; HAMMERFEST BASIN; MIDDLE EOCENE;
D O I
10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103609
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Uplift and erosion are complex phenomena in terms of their governing processes, precise timing and exact magnitude. The intricate relationship between different geodynamic processes leading to uplift may increase uncertainties in estimating spatial and temporal patterns. Sediment distribution from uplifted (and eroded) topography and the corresponding paleoenvironmental reconstructions require reliable constrains. The Barents Shelf provides a unique arena to study uplift and erosion due to extensive seismic and well data attributed to high petroleum activity. This particular interest has led to a voluminous literature about this topic over the last three decades. Here, we present the current status of the Cenozoic uplift and erosion on the Norwegian Barents Shelf by reviewing the key terminology, its tectonic history and paleoenvironment, methods in quantifying uplift and erosion, as well as timing and possible mechanisms. Our new erosion maps show an increase in net erosion to the north and northeast that represents key underlying concepts, including tectonic (compression, rift-flank uplift, thermo-mechanical coupling, mantle dynamics, flexural/isostatic response) as well as magmatic and glacial processes. We have integrated pre-glacial and glacial net erosion using the mass balance method and added our results from sonic velocity, interval velocity and sandstone diagenesis methods to the new maps. This review shows that discrepancies of net erosion estimates from different methods are on the order of 500 m. Finally, we identify research gaps for future studies, with implications for the Barents Shelf and other uplifted basins worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 271 条
[1]   Meso-Cenozoic exhumation and relevant isostatic process: The Barents and Kara shelves [J].
Amantov, Aleksey ;
Fjeldskaar, Willy .
JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2018, 118 :118-139
[2]  
Andersen MS, 2002, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V196, P291, DOI 10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.196.01.16
[3]   Massive blow-out craters formed by hydrate-controlled methane expulsion from the Arctic seafloor [J].
Andreassen, K. ;
Hubbard, A. ;
Winsborrow, M. ;
Patton, H. ;
Vadakkepuliyambatta, S. ;
Plaza-Faverola, A. ;
Gudlaugsson, E. ;
Serov, P. ;
Deryabin, A. ;
Mattingsdal, R. ;
Mienert, J. ;
Bunz, S. .
SCIENCE, 2017, 356 (6341) :948-952
[4]   Seafloor geomorphology of the SW Barents Sea and its glaci-dynamic implications [J].
Andreassen, Karin ;
Laberg, Jan Sverre ;
Vorren, Tore O. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 97 (1-2) :157-177
[5]   Cenozoic uplift and subsidence in the North Atlantic region: Geological evidence revisited [J].
Anell, I. ;
Thybo, H. ;
Artemieva, I. M. .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 2009, 474 (1-2) :78-105
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1989, AAPG MEM, DOI DOI 10.1306/M46497C36
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, THESIS
[8]   Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet: A modelling inter-comparison [J].
Auriac, A. ;
Whitehouse, P. L. ;
Bentley, M. J. ;
Patton, H. ;
Lloyd, J. M. ;
Hubbard, A. .
QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2016, 147 :122-135
[9]  
Avseth Per, 2016, Leading Edge, V35, P528, DOI 10.1190/tle35060528.1
[10]  
Avseth P., 2014, SEG TECHN PROGR EXP, V2014, P2809, DOI [10.1190/segam2014-1676.1, DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2014-1676.1]