Effects of Mechanical Instrumentation with Commercially Available Instruments Used in Supportive Peri-implant Therapy: An In Vitro Study

被引:17
作者
Sirinirund, Benyapha [1 ]
Garaicoa-Pazmino, Carlos [2 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [3 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Restorat Dent & Periodontol, Div Periodontol, Fac Dent, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, 1011 North Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Grad Periodont, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
maintenance; mechanical instrumentation; microtexture; peri-implant disease; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; ULTRASONIC SCALER TIPS; COMPLICATION RATES; PLASTIC INSTRUMENTS; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; TITANIUM SURFACES; CONSENSUS REPORT; ROUGH TITANIUM; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.7409
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate topographic changes and effectiveness of mechanical instrumentation upon machined (MA) and roughened (RG) surfaces of dental implants. Materials and Methods: The coronal one-third of seven RG and seven MA implants was coated with a mixture of cyanoacrylate and toluidine blue dye to resemble calculus. Implants were cleaned with three curettes (SS: stainless steel, PT: plastic, TI: titanium), two ultrasonic tips (UM: metal tip, UP: plastic tip), a titanium brush (TB), and an air-polishing device (AA) until visibly clean. Additionally, a simulation of 1- and 5 year supportive peri-implant therapy (SPT) was performed on 14 implants using the aforementioned instruments with 20 strokes/40 s (T-1) or 100 strokes/200 s (T-5). Each implant was evaluated using stereomicroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Results: UM was the most effective instrument, with 0% average percentage of residual artificial calculus (RAC), followed by TB (2.89%) and UP (4.90%). SS was more effective than TI (15.43% vs 20.12% RAC, respectively), while PT failed to remove any deposit (100% RAC). AA completely removed deposits on RG surfaces but not MA surfaces (26.61% RAC). Noticeable topographic changes were observed between both implant surfaces. RG surfaces became less rough, whereas MA surfaces became rougher at both T-1 and T-5 with the exception of AA. Plastic- and titanium-like remnants were noted after debridement with PT, SS, and TI, respectively. Conclusion: Artificial calculus removal by mechanical instrumentation, with the exception of PT, was proven to be clinically effective. All instruments induced minor to major topographic changes upon dental implant surfaces. AA did not remarkably change MA and RG surfaces at both micrometer and nanometer levels. Findings from this study may impact the selection of instruments or devices used during SPT protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1370 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years
    Aglietta, Marco
    Siciliano, Vincenzo Iorio
    Zwahlen, Marcel
    Braegger, Urs
    Pjetursson, Biarni E.
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (05) : 441 - 451
  • [2] Surface scratch assessment of titanium implant abutments and cementum following instrumentation with metal curettes
    Anastassiadis, P. M.
    Hall, C.
    Marino, V.
    Bartold, P. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 19 (02) : 545 - 551
  • [3] [Anonymous], ORAL HLTH DENT MANAG
  • [4] In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces
    Augthun, M
    Tinschert, J
    Huber, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (08) : 857 - 864
  • [5] A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years
    Berglundh, T
    Persson, L
    Klinge, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 29 : 197 - 212
  • [6] Berglundh T., 2002, J Clin Periodontol, V29, P197212
  • [7] Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions
    Berglundh, Tord
    Armitage, Gary
    Araujo, Mauricio G.
    Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
    Blanco, Juan
    Camargo, Paulo M.
    Chen, Stephen
    Cochran, David
    Derks, Jan
    Figuero, Elena
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A.
    Huynh-Ba, Guy
    Iacono, Vincent
    Koo, Ki-Tae
    Lambert, France
    McCauley, Laurie
    Quirynen, Marc
    Renvert, Stefan
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Schwarz, Frank
    Tarnow, Dennis
    Tomasi, Cristiano
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Zitzmann, Nicola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 89 : S313 - S318
  • [8] The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in-vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments
    Bertoldi, Carlo
    Lusuardi, Donatella
    Battarra, Francesca
    Sassatelli, Paolo
    Spinato, Sergio
    Zaffe, Davide
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [9] The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis
    Bollen, CML
    Papaioanno, W
    VanEldere, J
    Schepers, E
    Quirynen, M
    vanSteenberghe, D
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (03) : 201 - 211
  • [10] Root surface debridement and endotoxin removal
    Cadosch, J
    Zimmermann, U
    Ruppert, M
    Guindy, J
    Case, D
    Zappa, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (03) : 229 - 236