Two-impulse transfer to multi-revolution halo orbits in the Earth-Moon elliptic restricted three body problem framework

被引:1
作者
Neelakantan, Rithwik [1 ]
Ramanan, R., V [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Space Sci & Technol IIST, Dept Aerosp Engn, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
关键词
Lagrangian point; optimal two-impulse transfer; elliptic restricted three body problem; differential evolution; multi-revolution halo orbit; TRAJECTORY DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s12036-022-09830-x
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
For the design of transfer trajectories in the Earth-Moon system, the manifolds theory is popularly used in the existing literature. Because the manifolds in the Earth-Moon system do not pass close to the Earth, the transfers leveraging manifolds theory involves a bridge maneuver that transfers the space vehicle from the trans-halo trajectory to the stable manifold originating from the halo orbit. The transfer involves two segments, and the bridge impulse makes the number of velocity impulses three wherein, however, the third one is a very small one for halo orbit insertion. Alternately, a direct technique that generates two-impulse transfer trajectories to multi-revolution (MR) halo orbits around Lagrangian point L-1 in the Earth-Moon system under elliptic restricted three body problem framework is proposed. Unlike in the other direct transfer techniques, which divide the transfer trajectory into multiple segments, the proposed technique designs the transfer trajectory in a single segment. In the proposed technique, the first maneuver injects the space vehicle directly into the single segment transfer trajectory from an Earth parking orbit and the space vehicle reaches the MR halo orbit. The second maneuver inserts the space vehicle into the MR halo orbit. The location of insertion into the MR halo orbit and the components of the insertion velocity are treated as unknowns and obtained using differential evolution, an evolutionary optimization technique. The optimal solutions indicate that there exist trajectories with lower cost and for significantly lower time of flight than those reported in the literature for similar problems.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1920, PERIODIC ORBITS
  • [2] Fully Numerical Methods for Continuing Families of Quasi-Periodic Invariant Tori in Astrodynamics
    Baresi, Nicola
    Olikara, Zubin P.
    Scheeres, Daniel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 65 (02) : 157 - 182
  • [3] STABILITY OF PERIODIC ORBITS IN ELLIPTIC, RESTRICTED 3-BODY PROBLEM
    BROUCKE, R
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1969, 7 (06) : 1003 - &
  • [4] Campagnola S, 2008, ADV ASTRONAUT SCI, V130, P1541
  • [5] Orbit Design for LUMIO: The Lunar Meteoroid Impacts Observer
    Cipriano, Ana M.
    Dei Tos, Diogene A.
    Topputo, Francesco
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2018, 5
  • [6] Farquhar, 1972, ASTRONAUT AERONAUT, V59
  • [7] LUNAR COMMUNICATIONS WITH LIBRATION-POINT SATELLITES
    FARQUHAR, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1967, 4 (10) : 1383 - &
  • [8] Periodic motion around libration points in the Elliptic Restricted Three-Body Problem
    Ferrari, Fabio
    Lavagna, Michele
    [J]. NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2018, 93 (02) : 453 - 462
  • [9] An Earth-Moon system trajectory design reference catalog
    Folta, David C.
    Bosanac, Natasha
    Guzzetti, Davide
    Howell, Kathleen C.
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2015, 110 : 341 - 353
  • [10] The James Webb Space Telescope
    Gardner, Jonathan P.
    Mather, John C.
    Clampin, Mark
    Doyon, Rene
    Greenhouse, Matthew A.
    Hammel, Heidi B.
    Hutchings, John B.
    Jakobsen, Peter
    Lilly, Simon J.
    Long, Knox S.
    Lunine, Jonathan I.
    McCaughrean, Mark J.
    Mountain, Matt
    Nella, John
    Rieke, George H.
    Rieke, Marcia J.
    Rix, Hans-Walter
    Smith, Eric P.
    Sonneborn, George
    Stiavelli, Massimo
    Stockman, H. S.
    Windhorst, Rogier A.
    Wright, Gillian S.
    [J]. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2006, 123 (04) : 485 - 606