The Key Role of Production Efficiency Changes in Livestock Methane Emission Mitigation

被引:57
作者
Chang, Jinfeng [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Shushi [3 ]
Yin, Yi [4 ]
Ciais, Philippe [5 ]
Havlik, Petr [2 ]
Herrero, Mario [6 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, SinoFrench Inst Earth Syst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] CALTECH, Div Geol & Planetary Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[5] Univ Paris Saclay, CEA CNRS UVSQ, Lab Sci Climat & Environm, LSCE IPSL, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[6] CSIRO, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
来源
AGU ADVANCES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 02期
关键词
climate change; livestock; methane emission; mitigation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
D O I
10.1029/2021AV000391
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The livestock sector is the largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions and is projected to increase in the future with the increased demand for livestock products. Here, we compare livestock methane emissions and emission intensities, defined by the amount of methane emitted per unit of animal proteins, estimated by different methodologies, and identify mitigation potentials in different regions of the world based on possible future projections. We show that emission intensity decreased for most livestock categories globally during 2000-2018, due to an increasing protein-production efficiency, and the IPCC Tier 2 method should be used for capturing the temporal changes in the emission intensities. We further show that efforts on the demand-side to promote balanced, healthy, and environmentally sustainable diets in most countries will not be sufficient to mitigate livestock methane emissions without parallel efforts to improve production efficiency. The latter efforts have much greater mitigating effects than demand-side efforts, and hence should be prioritized in a few developing countries that contribute most of the mitigation potential.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY, V2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The future of food and agriculture: Alternative pathways to 2050
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Global Anthropogenic Non-C02 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990 - 2030
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GOOD PRACTICE GUIDAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GOOD PRACTICE GUIDAN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
[7]   Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies [J].
Caro, Dario ;
Kebreab, Ermias ;
Mitloehner, Frank M. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 137 (3-4) :467-480
[8]   Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature [J].
Chang, Jinfeng ;
Peng, Shushi ;
Ciais, Philippe ;
Saunois, Marielle ;
Dangal, Shree R. S. ;
Herrero, Mario ;
Havlik, Petr ;
Tian, Hanqin ;
Bousquet, Philippe .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[9]  
Cheung R., 2017, BACK GRASS MARKET PO
[10]  
Collins M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1029