Effects of data structure on the estimation of covariance functions to describe genotype by environment interactions in a reaction

被引:47
作者
Calus, MPL
Bijma, P
Veerkamp, RF
机构
[1] Div Anim Resources Dev, Anim Sci Grp, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Dept Anim Sci, Anim Breeding & Genet Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
environmental sensitivity; genotype by environment interaction; covariance function; environmental parameter;
D O I
10.1051/gse:2004013
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Covariance functions have been proposed to predict breeding values and genetic (co)variances as a function of phenotypic within herd-year averages (environmental parameters) to include genotype by environment interaction. The objective of this paper was to investigate the influence of definition of environmental parameters and non-random use of sires on expected breeding values and estimated genetic variances across environments. Breeding values were simulated as a linear function of simulated herd effects. The definition of environmental parameters hardly influenced the results. In situations with random use of sires, estimated emetic correlations between the trait expressed in different environments were 0.93, 0.93 and 0.97 while simulated at 0.89 and estimated genetic variances deviated up to 30% from the simulated values. Non random use of sires, poor genetic connectedness and small herd size had a large impact on the estimated covariance functions, expected breeding values and calculated environmental parameters. Estimated genetic correlations between a trait expressed in different environments were biased upwards and breeding values were more biased when genetic connectedness became poorer and herd composition more diverse. The best possible solution at this stage is to use environmental parameters combining large numbers of animals per herd, while losing some information on genotype by environment interaction in the data.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 507
页数:19
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model [J].
Calus, MPL ;
Veerkamp, RF .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2003, 86 (11) :3756-3764
[2]   Assessment of environmental descriptors for studying genotype by environment interaction [J].
Fikse, WF ;
Rekaya, R ;
Weigel, KA .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 82 (2-3) :223-231
[3]  
Foulley J., 1990, ADV STAT METHODGEN, VVolume 18, P277, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-74487-7_13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-74487-7_13]
[4]  
GILMOUR AR, 1908, ASREML REFERENCE MAN
[5]  
Henderson C. R., 1973, Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush, held July 29, 1972, at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia., P10
[6]   PROBABILITIES OF NON-POSITIVE DEFINITE BETWEEN-GROUP OR GENETIC COVARIANCE MATRICES [J].
HILL, WG ;
THOMPSON, R .
BIOMETRICS, 1978, 34 (03) :429-439
[7]  
Jaffrézic F, 2000, GENETICS, V156, P913
[8]   Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms [J].
Kolmodin, R ;
Strandberg, E ;
Madsen, P ;
Jensen, J ;
Jorjani, H .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 52 (01) :11-24
[9]   Joint estimation of breeding values and heterogeneous variances of large data files [J].
Meuwissen, THE ;
DeJong, G ;
Engel, B .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1996, 79 (02) :310-316
[10]   THE INFLUENCE OF COMPOSITE TRAITS ON GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS [J].
NAMKOONG, G .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1985, 70 (03) :315-317