Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategy for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

被引:8
|
作者
Sakuma, Tsuyoshi [1 ]
Kotani, Toshiaki [1 ]
Akazawa, Tsutomu [1 ,2 ]
Nakayama, Keita [1 ]
Iijima, Yasushi [1 ]
Shiratani, Yuki [1 ,3 ]
Kishida, Shunji [1 ]
Muramatsu, Yuta [1 ]
Sasaki, Yu [1 ]
Ueno, Keisuke [1 ]
Ohtori, Seiji [4 ]
Minami, Shohei [1 ]
机构
[1] Seirei Sakura Citizen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sakura, Japan
[2] St Marianna Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Teikyo Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chiba Med Ctr, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chiba, Japan
来源
SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH | 2021年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
adult spinal deformity; proximal junctional kyphosis; spinopelvic parameters; prevention strategy; CLASSIFICATION; IMBALANCE; OUTCOMES; FUSION;
D O I
10.22603/ssrr.2020-0093
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is an acute complication of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery and may require re-operation because of proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJK causes and prevention strategies remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the differences in the backgrounds of patients with PJK, compared to those without PJK, in ASD surgery. Methods: We included data from 86 patients who underwent ASD surgery between 2012 and 2018. There were 40 patients (46.5%) with PJK; 46 patients did not have PJK until the last follow-up. We evaluated patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiographic parameters, such as Cobb angle and spinopelvic parameters on standing X-ray films, in each group. Results: There was no significant difference in patient demographics, clinical outcomes, or preoperative radiographic parameters. Postoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) and pelvic tilt (PT) were significantly lower in the PJK group, and thoracic kyphosis (TK) was higher. The cutoff values were 34.5 degrees for TK, 0.5 degrees for PI-LL, and 15.5 degrees for PT. Other radiographic parameters were not significantly different. PJF developed in seven patients (17.5%) in the PJK group. PJF patients had significantly older age, higher postoperative TK, higher postoperative proximal junctional Cobb angle (PJA), more changes between pre- and postoperative PJA, and lower satisfaction scores on the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22 satisfaction) than non-PJF patients in the PJK group. Conclusions: One risk factor for PJK was lower postoperative PI-LL that was 0 degrees or less. In ASD surgery, the most critical factor in a PJK prevention strategy is to obtain a postoperative LL adjusted by PI, which is >0 degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of Tethers for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prophylaxis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence
    Sursal, Tolga
    Kim, Han Jo
    Sardi, Juan Pablo
    Yen, Chun-Po
    Smith, Justin S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 : S26 - S37
  • [32] Is Sacral Extension a Risk Factor for Early Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?
    Decker, Sebastian
    Lafage, Renaud
    Krettek, Christian
    Hart, Robert
    Ames, Christopher
    Smith, Justin S.
    Burton, Douglas
    Klineberg, Eric
    Bess, Shay
    Schwab, Frank J.
    Lafage, Virginie
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (02) : 212 - 219
  • [33] Revision Surgery for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and the Role for Addressing Residual Deformity
    Clohisy, John C. F.
    Kim, Han Jo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 : S65 - S74
  • [34] Posterior Displacement of L1 May be a Risk Factor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction
    Xi, Zhuo
    Duan, Ping-Guo
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    Liu, Jinping
    Guinn, Jeremy M., V
    Wang, Minghao
    Li, Bo
    Wu, Hao-Hua
    Rivera, Joshua
    Burch, Shane
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    Chou, Dean
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (04) : 1042 - 1048
  • [35] Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in the Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: Definitions and Epidemiology
    Watanabe, Kota
    Yagi, Mitsuru
    Fujita, Nobuyuki
    Suzuki, Satoshi
    Tsuji, Osahiko
    Nagoshi, Narihito
    Okada, Eijiro
    Nakamura, Masaya
    Matumoto, Morio
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 36 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [36] Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis after internal fixation for adult spinal deformity: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis
    Jian Zhao
    Kai Chen
    Xiao Zhai
    Kai Chen
    Ming Li
    Yanghu Lu
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 855 - 866
  • [37] Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and/or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Aguirre, Alexander O.
    Ruggiero, Nicco
    Kruk, Marissa
    Khan, Asham
    Ghannam, Moleca M.
    Almeida, Neil D.
    Jowdy, Patrick K.
    Smolar, David E.
    Pollina, John
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 92 (05) : 945 - 954
  • [38] Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Radiographic Measurements in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Rastegar, Farbod
    Contag, Alec
    Daniels, Alan
    Hiratzka, Jayme
    Lin, Clifford
    Chang, Jason
    Than, Khoi
    Raslan, Ahmed
    Kong, Christopher
    Ngoc-Lam Nguyen
    Hostin, Richard
    Kane, Marie
    Hart, Robert A.
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (01) : E40 - E44
  • [39] Characteristics and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lixue Zou
    Jun Liu
    Hougen Lu
    Neurosurgical Review, 2019, 42 : 671 - 682
  • [40] A Patient-specific Approach to Alignment and Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Risk Assessment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Development and Validation of a Predictive Tool
    Hills, Jeffrey M.
    Weisenthal, Benjamin M.
    Wanner, John P.
    Gupta, Rishabh
    Steinle, Anthony
    Pennings, Jacquelyn S.
    Stephens, Byron F.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (06): : 256 - 263