Collective agri-environment schemes: How can regional environmental cooperatives enhance farmers' intentions for agri-environment schemes?

被引:79
|
作者
van Dijk, William F. A. [1 ,2 ]
Lokhorst, Anne Marike [3 ]
Berendse, Frank [1 ]
de Snoo, Geert R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Nat Conservat & Plant Ecol Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Sch Biol Sci, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, Scotland
[3] Wageningen Univ, Dept Social Sci, Strateg Commun Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Theory of Planned Behaviour; Ditch bank management; Meadow bird management; Farmer behaviour; Nature conservation; Payment by results; PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; SOCIAL IDENTITY; SELF-EFFICACY; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of agri-environment schemes (AES) in enhancing biodiversity on farmland and creating a long-lasting change in farmers' motivation towards a more environmental-friendly practice is still strongly debated. Applying a regional approach has been advocated widely to make AES more ecologically and socially sustainable. In the Netherlands, some AES are performed collectively by large regional groups of farmers called Environmental Cooperatives (EC). We hypothesise that these cooperatives enhance farmers' intention to participate by facilitating the application of AES, but also by generating group pressure. In the study at hand, we used an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to investigate which factors are associated with farmers' intention to participate in two kinds of collective AES (ditch bank management and the protection of meadow birds). Our results demonstrate that attitude and perceived personal ability to participate in these AES are associated with the intention of farmers to participate in ditch bank management. However, for the protection of meadow birds, social pressure, self-identity and facilitation by the EC also relate to the intention of farmers. We conclude that the facilitation undertaken by ECs positively relates to farmers' intention to participate in collective AES. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 766
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England
    Ovenden, GN
    Swash, ARH
    Smallshire, D
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1998, 35 (06) : 955 - 960
  • [12] Optimizing the biodiversity gain from agri-environment schemes
    Merckx, Thomas
    Feber, Ruth E.
    Riordan, Philip
    Townsend, Martin C.
    Bourn, Nigel A. D.
    Parsons, Mark S.
    Macdonald, David W.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 130 (3-4) : 177 - 182
  • [13] Temporal effects of agri-environment schemes on ditch bank plant species
    van Dijk, William F. A.
    Schaffers, Andre P.
    Leewis, Lies
    Berendse, Frank
    de Snoo, Geert R.
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 14 (04) : 289 - 297
  • [14] Do agri-environment schemes result in improved water quality?
    Jones, J. Iwan
    Murphy, John F.
    Anthony, Steven G.
    Arnold, Amanda
    Blackburn, John H.
    Duerdoth, Chas P.
    Hawczak, Adrianna
    Hughes, Greg O.
    Pretty, James L.
    Scarlett, Peter M.
    Gooday, Richard D.
    Zhang, Yusheng S.
    Fawcett, Laura E.
    Simpson, Diane
    Turner, Anthony W. B.
    Naden, Pamela S.
    Skates, James
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (02) : 537 - 546
  • [15] The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers' concerns with current schemes?
    Emery, Steven B.
    Franks, Jeremy R.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2012, 28 (03) : 218 - 231
  • [16] Developing Farm-Level Social Indicators for Agri-Environment Schemes: A Focus on the Agents of Change
    Mills, Jane
    Chiswell, Hannah
    Gaskell, Peter
    Courtney, Paul
    Brockett, Beth
    Cusworth, George
    Lobley, Matt
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [17] Environmental evaluation of agri-environment schemes using participatory approaches: Experiences of testing the Agri-Environmental Footprint Index
    Mauchline, Alice L.
    Mortimer, Simon R.
    Park, Julian R.
    Finn, John A.
    Haysom, Karen
    Westbury, Duncan B.
    Purvis, Gordon
    Louwagie, Geertrui
    Northey, Greg
    Primdahl, Jorgen
    Vejre, Henrik
    Kristensen, Lone Soderkvist
    Teilmann, Kasper Vind
    Vesterager, Jens Peter
    Knickel, Karlheinz
    Kasperczyk, Nadia
    Balazs, Katalin
    Podmaniczky, Laszlo
    Vlahos, George
    Christopoulos, Stamatios
    Kroger, Laura
    Aakkula, Jyrki
    Yli-Viikari, Anja
    LAND USE POLICY, 2012, 29 (02) : 317 - 328
  • [18] The impact of agri-environment schemes on farm productivity: a DID-matching approach
    Mennig, Philipp
    Sauer, Johannes
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 47 (03) : 1045 - 1093
  • [19] Ecological effectiveness of French grassland agri-environment schemes for farmland bird communities
    Prince, Karine
    Jiguet, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 121 : 110 - 116
  • [20] Agri-environment schemes and foraging of barn owls Tyto alba
    Askew, Nicholas P.
    Searle, Jeremy B.
    Moore, Niall P.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) : 109 - 114