(Post-) pandemic tourism resiliency: Southeast Asian lives and livelihoods in limbo

被引:48
作者
Adams, Kathleen M. [1 ,5 ]
Choe, Jaeyeon [2 ,6 ]
Mostafanezhad, Mary [3 ]
Giang Thi Phi [4 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Dept Anthropol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Bournemouth Univ, Fac Management, Poole, Dorset, England
[3] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Geog & Environm, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Duy Tan Univ, Hospitality & Tourism Inst, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Danang, Vietnam
[5] Univ London, SOAS, London, England
[6] Hue Univ, Sch Hospitality & Tourism, Hue, Vietnam
关键词
COVID-19; tourism; livelihoods; cultural revitalization; resilience; disaster; Southeast Asia; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1080/14616688.2021.1916584
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While tourism scholars have sought to problematize the unevenly distributed impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, we know much less about how resilience is cultivated among tourism practitioners and communities whose lives and livelihoods are have been placed in limbo. Drawing on literature at the intersection of critical tourism studies and resilience theory as well as interviews with local tourism practitioners and academics, four historically situated and place-based trends in Southeast Asia that are reshaping tourism in the region are outlined: livelihood diversification, ecosystem regeneration, cultural revitalization, and domestic tourism development. These trends highlight how the political economy of tourism in the region has both challenged and facilitated opportunities for reshaping the industry in (post-) pandemic times. These interconnected trends should not be understood in silo but rather as historically rooted and place-based experiences. The examples of resilience among Southeast Asian residents presented in the article demonstrate that local individuals and communities are active agents in resilience. While the concept of resilience has been applied widely by scholars from multiple disciplines during the COVID-19 pandemic, a critical tourism studies approach to resilience theory accounts for the historically situated nuances of local scale dynamics and their relationship to macro-level processes. Rather than simply focusing on the pandemic's sudden transformative effects, practices of resilience in Southeast Asia reflect ongoing political-economic and cultural shifts that have often been underway in the region for several decades. The conclusion identifies several policy implications and future directions for tourism research in (post-) pandemic times.
引用
收藏
页码:915 / 936
页数:22
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Adams K., 1998, Indonesia and the Malay World, V26, P77, DOI 10.1080/13639819808729913
[2]  
Adams Kathleen., 2006, Art as politics: Recrafting identities, tourism, and power in Tana Toraja
[3]   What western tourism concepts obscure: intersections of migration and tourism in Indonesia [J].
Adams, Kathleen M. .
TOURISM GEOGRAPHIES, 2021, 23 (04) :678-703
[4]  
Adams KM, 2018, TOUR CULT COMMUN, V18, P287, DOI [10.3727/109830418x15369281878422, 10.3727/109830418X15369281878422]
[5]  
Adams KM, 2018, ROUTL HANDBK, P197
[6]  
Adams KM, 2012, ELGAR ORIG REF, P339
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ALJAZEERA 0907
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Local Economic Impact Report
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SCHEPER HUGHES BOURG
[10]   Community resilience to long-term tourism decline and rejuvenation: a literature review and conceptual model [J].
Bec, Alexandra ;
McLennan, Char-lee ;
Moyle, Brent D. .
CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2016, 19 (05) :431-457