Same-Sex Couples' Psychological Interventions: A Systematic Review

被引:13
作者
Kousteni, Ioanna [1 ]
Anagnostopoulos, Fotios [1 ]
机构
[1] Pante Univ Social & Polit Sci, Psychol Dept, Athens 17671, Greece
来源
JOURNAL OF COUPLE & RELATIONSHIP THERAPY-INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL AND EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS | 2020年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
Same-sex couples; systematic review; outcome research; psychological interventions; RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION; LESBIAN COUPLES; FAMILY-THERAPY; BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BISEXUAL ISSUES; GAY; INDIVIDUALS; ALCOHOL; MEN;
D O I
10.1080/15332691.2019.1667937
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Despite the growing literature on LGBTQ + individuals' mental health, there has been no publication of a systematic review focused exclusively on effective psychological interventions for same-sex couples (SSC). The aim of this review is to investigate whether there are any empirical quantitative studies evaluating the outcome of couple psychological interventions specifically delivered to SSC. Multiple databases were screened by two independent reviewers for studies published between Jan 1996-Dec 2017. Hand-searching included journals, books and grey literature. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Pre-defined eligibility criteria, methodological quality assessments and qualitative synthesis of the results were applied. After reviewing 1,451 citations, 9 eligible studies were identified with 583 SSC. They represent five unique psychoeducational or psychotherapeutic interventions, namely Relationship Education, Couples HIV Testing and Counseling, Gottman Method Couples Therapy, Behavior Couples Therapy, and "Connect with Pride." The overall risk of bias of included trials was moderate. Affirmative outcomes were related to high satisfaction with the interventions and improvements on multiple variables such as health-related behaviors, relationship enhancement, drug/alcohol abuse. The current review confirms that SSC are still underrepresented in couple outcome research. There is preliminary evidence of possible benefits regarding couple interventions for SSC.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 174
页数:39
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Expanding the Therapy Paradigm with Queer Couples: A Relational Intersectional Lens
    Addison, Sheila M.
    Coolhart, Deborah
    [J]. FAMILY PROCESS, 2015, 54 (03) : 435 - 453
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, NORTON SERIES INTERP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, METH DEV NIC PUBL HL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, Guidance on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for serodiscordant couples, men and transgender women who have sex with men at high risk of HIV: recommendations for use in the context of demonstration projects
  • [6] Gay and Lesbian Couples in Italy: Comparisons with Heterosexual Couples
    Antonelli, Paolo
    Dettore, Davide
    Lasagni, Irene
    Snyder, Douglas K.
    Balderrama-Durbin, Christina
    [J]. FAMILY PROCESS, 2014, 53 (04) : 702 - 716
  • [7] Baetens P., 2002, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V6, P75, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62059-7, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62059-7]
  • [8] Barker M., 2007, OUT PSYCHOL LESBIAN, P95, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470713099.CH6
  • [9] Gay and lesbian couples in therapy: Perspectives for the contemporary family therapist
    Bepko, C
    Johnson, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, 2000, 26 (04) : 409 - 419
  • [10] Cognitive behavioral group therapy versus psychoeducational intervention in Parkinson's disease
    Berardelli, Isabella
    Bloise, Maria Carmela
    Bologna, Matteo
    Conte, Antonella
    Pompili, Maurizio
    Lamis, Dorian A.
    Pasquini, Massimo
    Fabbrini, Giovanni
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2018, 14 : 399 - 405