The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Li, Junsheng [1 ]
Wang, Yong [2 ]
Wu, Lisheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Zhongda Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp USTC 1, Dept Hernia & Bariatr Surg, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
eTEP; IPOM; ventral hernia; incisional hernia; repair;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open sublay technique and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique are the most common used procedures in ventral and incisional hernia repair, however, each technique has its own disadvantages. The enhanced view total extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) aims to put the mesh in the retromuscular space by minimal invasive technique. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of eTEP and IPOM approach in ventral and incisional hernia repair. Methods: The major databases (PubMed, Embase, Springer, and Cochrane Library) were searched, and all studies published through May 1, 2021, using the keywords "enhanced view extraperitoneal," "extended view totally extraperitoneal," "eTEP," "TEP," "laparoscopic retromuscular," "ventral hernia," "incisional hernia," "laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh," "IPOM." All relevant articles and reference lists in these original studies were also obtained from the above databases. Results: Five trials containing 433 patients were included in the present study. Compared with the IPOM technique, the eTEP ventral/incisional hernia repair was associated a longer operative time [mean difference=44.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.57, 63; P=0.00001], less acute pain on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference=-3.90; 95% CI: -4.42, -3.38; P<0.00001), and day 7 (standardized mean difference=-3.72; 95% CI: -6.09, 1.35; P=0.002), and the eTEP group had a shorter hospital stay compared with the IPOM group (mean difference=-0.56; 95% CI: -0.74, -0.39; P=0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning the incidence of seroma, hematoma, intraoperative complication, and postoperative ileus between eTEP and IPOM groups. Conclusions: The eTEP technique in ventral and incisional hernia repair shows significantly lower acute postoperative pain and shorter hospital study but a longer operative time. In addition, there is no significant difference in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Further randomized controlled studies with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the eTEP technique.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ventral Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Holihan, Julie L.
    Hannon, Craig
    Goodenough, Christopher
    Flores-Gonzalez, Juan R.
    Itani, Kamal M.
    Olavarria, Oscar
    Mo, Jiandi
    Ko, Tien C.
    Kao, Lillian S.
    Liang, Mike K.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2017, 18 (06) : 647 - 658
  • [42] Endoscopic retromuscular technique (eTEP) vs conventional laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair with defect closure (IPOM +) for midline hernias. A case–control study
    J. Bellido Luque
    J. C. Gomez Rosado
    A. Bellido Luque
    J. Gomez Menchero
    J. M. Suarez Grau
    I. Sanchez Matamoros
    A. Nogales Muñoz
    F. Oliva Mompeán
    S. Morales Conde
    Hernia, 2021, 25 : 1061 - 1070
  • [43] Is pooled data analysis of ventral and incisional hernia repair acceptable?
    Koeckerling, Ferdinand
    Schug-Pass, Christine
    Adolf, Daniela
    Reinpold, Wolfgang
    Stechemesser, Bernd
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2015, 2
  • [44] Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic hernioplasty with and without fascial repair (IPOM-Plus vs IPOM) for ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study
    Basukala, Sunil
    Tamang, Ayush
    Rawal, Sushil Bahadur
    Malla, Srijan
    Bhusal, Ujwal
    Dhakal, Subodh
    Sharma, Shriya
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 80
  • [45] Heavyweight versus non-heavyweight mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oliveira Trindade, Bruna
    Marcolin, Patricia
    Brandao, Gabriela R.
    Bueno Motter, Sarah
    Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Sergio
    Diana Mao, Rui-Min
    Lu, Richard
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (02) : 291 - 300
  • [46] Systematic review and network meta-analysis of methods of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
    Baker, J. J.
    Oeberg, S.
    Andresen, K.
    Klausen, T. W.
    Rosenberg, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [47] Heavyweight versus non-heavyweight mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bruna Oliveira Trindade
    Patrícia Marcolin
    Gabriela R Brandao
    Sarah Bueno Motter
    Sérgio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo
    Rui-Min Diana Mao
    Richard Lu
    Hernia, 2024, 28 : 291 - 300
  • [48] Surgical site infection in mesh repair for ventral hernia in contaminated field: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Maatouk, Mohamed
    Ben Safta, Yacine
    Mabrouk, Aymen
    Kbir, Ghassen Hamdi
    Ben Dhaou, Anis
    Daldoul, Sami
    Sayari, Sofien
    Haouet, Karim
    Dziri, Chadli
    Ben Moussa, Mounir
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 63
  • [49] Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy
    F. De Haes
    N. L. Bullen
    G. A. Antoniou
    N. J. Smart
    S. A. Antoniou
    Hernia, 2020, 24 : 9 - 21
  • [50] Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy
    De Haes, F.
    Bullen, N. L.
    Antoniou, G. A.
    Smart, N. J.
    Antoniou, S. A.
    HERNIA, 2020, 24 (01) : 9 - 21