Rectal cancer delivery of radiotherapy in adequate time and with adequate dose is influenced by treatment center, treatment schedule, and gender and is prognostic parameter for local control:: Results of study CAO/ARO/AIO-94

被引:51
作者
Fietkau, Rainer
Roedel, Claus
Hohenberger, Werner
Raab, Rudolf
Hess, Clemens
Liersch, Torsten
Becker, Heinz
Wittekind, Christian
Hutter, Matthias
Hager, Eva
Karstens, Johann
Ewald, Hermann
Christen, Norbert
Jagoditsch, Michael
Martus, Peter
Sauer, Rolf
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Dept Radiat Therapy, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Radiat Therapy, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Surg, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Klinikum Oldenburg, Dept Surg, Oldenburg, Germany
[5] Univ Gottingen, Dept Radiat Therapy, Gottingen, Germany
[6] Univ Gottingen, Dept Gen Surg, Gottingen, Germany
[7] Univ Leipzig, Inst Pathol, D-7010 Leipzig, Germany
[8] Krankenhaus Nordwest Frankfurt, Dept Radiat Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
[9] Krankenhaus Klagenfurt, Dept Radiat Therapy, Klagenfurt, Austria
[10] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Dept Radiat Therapy, Hannover, Germany
[11] Univ Schleswig Holstein, Dept Radiat Therapy, Kiel, Germany
[12] Krankenhaus Dresden Friedrichstadt, Dept Radiat Therapy, Dresden, Germany
[13] Klinikum St Veit, Dept Surg, St Veit, Austria
[14] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Biostat & Clin Epidemiol, Charite, Berlin, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 67卷 / 04期
关键词
rectal cancer; locoregional recurrence rate; delivery of radiotherapy; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; adjuvant chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The impact of the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) on treatment results in rectal cancer patients is unknown. Methods and Materials: The data from 788 patients with rectal cancer treated within the German CAO/AIO/ARO-94 phase III trial were analyzed concerning the impact of the delivery of RT (adequate RT: minimal radiation RT dose delivered, 4300 cGy for neoadjuvant RT or 4700 cGy for adjuvant RT; completion of RT in < 44 days for neoadjuvant RT or < 49 days for adjuvant RT) in different centers on the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. The LRR, DFS, and delivery of RT were analyzed as endpoints in multivariate analysis. Results: A significant difference was found between the centers and the delivery of RT. The overall delivery of RT was a prognostic factor for the LRR (no RT, 29.6% +/- 7.8%; inadequate RT, 21.2% +/- 5.6%; adequate RT, 6.8% +/- 1.4%; p = 0.0001) and DFS (no RT, 55.1% +/- 9.1%; inadequate RT, 57.4% +/- 6.3%; adequate RT, 69.1% +/- 2.3%; p = 0.02). Postoperatively, delivery of RT was a prognostic factor for LRR on multivariate analysis (together with pathologic stage) but not for DFS (independent parameters, pathologic stage and age). Preoperatively, on multivariate analysis, pathologic stage, but not delivery of RT, was an independent prognostic parameter for LRR and DFS (together with adequate chemotherapy). On multivariate analysis, the treatment center, treatment schedule (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant RT), and gender were prognostic parameters for adequate RT. Conclusion: Delivery of RT should be regarded as a prognostic factor for LRR in rectal cancer and is influenced by the treatment center, treatment schedule, and patient gender. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1019
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, TNM classification of malignant tumors
  • [2] Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for colorectal cancer in a population-based cohort
    Ayanian, JZ
    Zaslavsky, AM
    Fuchs, CS
    Guadagnoli, E
    Creech, CM
    Cress, RD
    O'Connor, LC
    West, DW
    Allen, ME
    Wolf, RE
    Wright, WE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (07) : 1293 - 1300
  • [3] Beart R W, 1995, J Am Coll Surg, V181, P225
  • [4] Quality of treatment in routine care in a population sample of rectal cancer patients
    Engel, J
    Kerr, J
    Eckel, R
    Günther, B
    Heiss, M
    Heitland, W
    Jauch, KW
    Siewert, JR
    Hölzel, D
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [5] Fietkau R, 2004, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V180, P478, DOI 10.1007/s00066-004-1260-z
  • [6] Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994-99
    Harling, H
    Bülow, S
    Moller, LN
    Jorgensen, T
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2005, 7 (01) : 90 - 95
  • [7] Impact of surgeon's technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma
    Hermanek, P
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (05) : 559 - 562
  • [8] HERMANEK P, 1995, TUMORI, V81, P60
  • [9] Herrmann T, 2005, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V181, P212, DOI 10.1007/s00066-005-1331-9
  • [10] Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer
    Hodgson, DC
    Zhang, W
    Zaslavsky, AM
    Fuchs, CS
    Wright, WE
    Ayanian, JZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (10) : 708 - 716