A coupled model of leaf photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and leaf energy balance for chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora)

被引:21
|
作者
Janka, Eshetu [1 ]
Korner, Oliver [2 ]
Rosenqvist, Eva [3 ]
Ottosen, Carl-Otto [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Southeast Norway, Dept Proc Energy & Environm Technol, Kjolnes Ring 56, N-3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
[2] Danish Technol Inst, AgroTech, Dept Plant Technol, Hojbakkegard Alle 21, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Crop Sci, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, Hojbakkegard Alle 9, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Food Sci Plant Food & Climate, Kirstinebjergvej 10, DK-5792 Arslev, Denmark
关键词
Climate regimes; Decision support; Greenhouse; Microclimate; Simulation; Monitoring; CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS; QUANTUM YIELDS; CO2; UPTAKE; TEMPERATURE; C-3; LEAVES; TRANSPIRATION; RESPONSES; COMPONENT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2016.02.022
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
While dynamic greenhouse climatic regimes are often applied to achieve energy efficiency, dynamic mechanistic models can assist in climate control decisions, and to elucidate plant stress under extreme microclimatic conditions. The present study developed a couple model with three integrated sub models to predict net leaf photosynthesis (P-n1), stomatal conductance (g(s)), and leaf temperature under different microclimatic conditions: (1) a C-3 photosynthesis biochemical model; (2) a stomatal conductance model; and (3) a leaf energy balance model. Leaf photochemical efficiency and maximum gross photosynthesis using a negative exponential light response curve were modelled with different leaf temperatures, light levels, and CO2 concentrations. The stomatal conductance and leaf energy balance models were calibrated independently. P-n1, g(s), and leaf temperature model predictions were validated with independent measurements and climate input data. Model performance was evaluated by a linear regression of predicted values relative to observed values. The coupled model estimated P-nl with a 2-12% mean difference between the observed and the model, and a 1.82 degrees C maximum leaf temperature difference between the observed and the model. An additional stomatal model was implemented for comparison, and tested against the model system. Our model showed a better fit to P-n1, leaf temperature, and stomatal conductance validation data. The coupled model was therefore a good predictor for crop growth and microclimate. We suggest a multi-model approach with self-selective sub-models to assist in decisions optimising light, temperature, and CO2 for maximum photosynthetic rates for climatic conditions applied in the model (i.e. high light, temperature, and CO2 concentration). Furthermore, the model leaf temperature prediction could be used for leaf temperature monitoring under unfavorable microclimatic conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 274
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条