Low levels of estrogen receptor β protein predict resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer

被引:151
|
作者
Hopp, TA
Weiss, HL
Parra, IS
Cui, Y
Osborne, CK
Fuqua, SAW
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Breast Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Mol & Cellular Biol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1114
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Breast cancer is a hormone-dependent cancer, and the presence of estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) in tumors is used clinically to predict the likelihood of response to hormonal therapies. The clinical value of the second recently identified ER isoform, called ER-beta, is less clear, and there is currently conflicting data concerning its potential role as a prognostic or predictive factor. Experimental Design: To assess whether ER-P expression is associated with clinical outcome, protein levels were measured by immunoblot analysis of a retrospective bank of tumor cell lysates from 305 axillary node-positive patients. A total of 119 received no adjuvant therapy, and 186 were treated with tamoxifen only. The median follow-up time was 65 months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling was done to assess the prognostic and predictive significance of ER-beta expression. Results: Expression of ER-beta protein did not correlate significantly with any other clinical variables, including ER and progesterone levels (as measured ligand binding assay), tumor size, age, or axillary nodal status. In the untreated population, those patients whose tumors who expressed both receptor isoforms exhibited the most favorable outcome as compared with those patients who had lost ER-alpha expression. However, there was no association between ER-beta levels alone and either disease-free or overall survival in the untreated patient population. In contrast, in both univariate and multivariate analyses, high levels of ER-beta predicted an improved disease-free and overall survival in patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that ER-beta may be an independent predictor of response to tamoxifen in breast cancer. Furthermore, these results suggest that ER-beta may influence tumor progression in ways different from those mediated by the ER-alpha isoform.
引用
收藏
页码:7490 / 7499
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer
    De Marchi, Tommaso
    Foekens, John A.
    Umar, Arzu
    Martens, John W. M.
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2016, 21 (07) : 1181 - 1188
  • [22] Overcoming tamoxifen resistance and inhibiting metastatic recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Ersan, Pelin Gulizar
    Saatci, Ozge
    Tarman, Oguzhan
    Mishra, Rasmi
    Belder, Nevin
    Tokat, Unal Metin
    Riazalhosseini, Yasser
    Sahin, Ozgur
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (13)
  • [23] MUC1 induces tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Merikhian, Parnaz
    Ghadirian, Reyhane
    Farahmand, Leila
    Mansouri, Sepideh
    Majidzadeh-A, Keivan
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2017, 17 (07) : 607 - 613
  • [24] Molecular biology of the estrogen receptor aids in the understanding of tamoxifen resistance and breast cancer prevention with raloxifene
    Jordan, VC
    ADJUVANT THERAPY OF PRIMARY BREAST CANCER VI, 1998, 152 : 265 - 276
  • [25] Monopolar spindle 1 contributes to tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer through phosphorylation of estrogen receptor α
    Xuemiao Zhang
    Linfei Huang
    Jing Sun
    Jialong Liu
    Yulong Zong
    Luming Wan
    Xiaopan Yang
    Xue Yan
    Yanhong Zhang
    Ruzhou Zhao
    Jing Liu
    Hui Zhong
    Congwen Wei
    Xiaoli Yang
    Yanhong Tai
    Yue Han
    Yanhai Wang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023, 202 : 595 - 606
  • [26] Monopolar spindle 1 contributes to tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer through phosphorylation of estrogen receptor a
    Zhang, Xuemiao
    Huang, Linfei
    Sun, Jing
    Liu, Jialong
    Zong, Yulong
    Wan, Luming
    Yang, Xiaopan
    Yan, Xue
    Zhang, Yanhong
    Zhao, Ruzhou
    Liu, Jing
    Zhong, Hui
    Wei, Congwen
    Yang, Xiaoli
    Tai, Yanhong
    Han, Yue
    Wang, Yanhai
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 202 (03) : 595 - 606
  • [27] Sphingosine kinase 1 activation by estrogen receptor α36 contributes to tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer
    Maczis, Melissa A.
    Maceyka, Michael
    Waters, Michael R.
    Newton, Jason
    Singh, Manjulata
    Rigsby, Madisyn F.
    Turner, Tia H.
    Alzubi, Mohammad A.
    Harrell, J. Chuck
    Milstien, Sheldon
    Spiegel, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH, 2018, 59 (12) : 2297 - 2307
  • [28] Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer
    Lei, Jonathan T.
    Shao, Jieya
    Zhang, Jin
    Iglesia, Michael
    Chan, Doug W.
    Matsunuma, Ryoichi
    He, Xiaping
    Singh, Purba
    Kosaka, Yoshimasa
    Crowder, Robert
    Haricharan, Svasti
    Kavuri, Shyam
    Hoog, Jeremy
    Phommaly, Chanpheng
    Goncalves, Rodrigo
    Romalho, Susana
    Lai, Wei-Chu
    Hampton, Oliver
    Rogers, Anna
    Tobias, Ethan
    Parikh, Poojan
    Davies, Sherri
    Ma, Cynthia
    Suman, Vera
    Hunt, Kelly
    Watson, Mark
    Hoadley, Katherine A.
    Thompson, Aubrey
    Perou, Charles
    Creighton, Chad J.
    Maher, Chris
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [29] Tamoxifen for patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer
    Swain, SM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (18) : 93S - 97S
  • [30] Identification of a Putative Protein Profile Associated with Tamoxifen Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer
    Umar, Arzu
    Kang, Hyuk
    Timmermans, Annemieke M.
    Look, Maxime P.
    Meijer-van Gelder, Marion E.
    den Bakker, Michael A.
    Jaitly, Navdeep
    Martens, John W. M.
    Luider, Theo M.
    Foekens, John A.
    Pasa-Tolic, Ljiljana
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2009, 8 (06) : 1278 - 1294