Review of environmental performance of sheep farming using life cycle assessment

被引:33
作者
Bhatt, Akul [1 ]
Abbassi, Bassim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
Sheep farming; Life cycle assessment; Agriculture; Climate change; Lamb; Wool; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; WOOL PRODUCTION; RESOURCE USE; SCENARIOS; LAMB; MANAGEMENT; WALES; MILK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126192
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is increasingly being used as a tool to estimate environmental impacts in the sheep sector. Policymakers have been keener on developing policies and recommending best management practices from a life cycle perspective. This paper reviews the key LCA studies of the sheep sector within the last fifteen years to assess the state of the art of the environmental impacts of the sheep supply chain. Peer-reviewed LCAs as well as global, organizational efforts on the subject have also been reviewed and discussed. Discussions are categorized by products, hotspots, methodologies and system boundaries, and impacts of interest. The vast majority of studies have utilized a "cradle-to-farmgate" system boundary, where impacts associated with production of major farm inputs, management/applications of inputs and direct emissions from livestock are included. The sole focus of the majority of studies in terms of the category of impact has been climate change, quantified through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The impact results are difficult to generalize due to wide discrepancies in farming practices, production efficiencies, product allocation and emission modeling methods. The GHG emissions, however, associated with sheep meat, milk and wool fall in the range of 3.5-25 kg CO2-eq/kg live weight, 2-5 kg CO2-eq/kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM), and 20-60 kg CO2-eq/kg greasy wool, respectively. The overwhelming consensus is that the single largest contributor to GHG emissions is direct methanic emission from livestock, generally contributing to 50%-75% of overall GHG emissions. More research needs to be conducted on determining impacts of "post-farm" activities such as processing of sheep products before it reaches the consumers, inclusion of the benefits of carbon sequestration, and consideration of environmental impacts other than climate change. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
AFI, 2009, FARMGAS CALC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids, V6th
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 16266 ISO, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.332.7550.1107
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[6]  
Atzori A.S., 2015, RIV STUDI SOSTENIBIL, V2015, P117, DOI [10.3280/RISS2015-001008, DOI 10.3280/RISS2015-001008]
[7]  
Batalla I., 2014, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), San Francisco, California, USA, 8-10 October, 2014, P88
[8]   Carbon footprint of milk from sheep farming systems in Northern Spain including soil carbon sequestration in grasslands [J].
Batalla, Inmaculada ;
Knudsen, Marie Trydeman ;
Mogensen, Lisbeth ;
del Hierro, Oscar ;
Pinto, Miriam ;
Hermansen, John E. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 104 :121-129
[9]   The effect of future climate scenarios on the balance between productivity and greenhouse gas emissions from sheep grazing systems [J].
Bell, M. J. ;
Eckard, R. J. ;
Cullen, B. R. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2012, 147 (1-3) :126-138
[10]   Global warming contributions from wheat, sheep meat and wool production in Victoria, Australia - a life cycle assessment [J].
Biswas, Wahidul K. ;
Graham, John ;
Kelly, Kevin ;
John, Michele B. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (14) :1386-1392