Diagnostic performance of a biomarker panel as a negative predictor for acute appendicitis in adult ED patients with abdominal pain

被引:8
作者
Huckins, David S. [1 ]
Copeland, Karen [2 ]
Self, Wesley [3 ]
Vance, Cheryl [4 ]
Hendry, Phyllis [5 ]
Borg, Keith [6 ]
Gogain, Joseph [7 ]
机构
[1] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, 2014 Washington St, Newton, MA 02462 USA
[2] Boulder Stat LLC, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Jacksonville, FL USA
[6] Med Univ South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[7] Venaxis Inc, Castle Rock, CO USA
关键词
Biomarker; Appendicitis; Adult; Computed tomography; Sensitivity; Diagnostic accuracy; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; BLOOD-CELL COUNT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; RISK; DURATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.027
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the APPY1TMbiomarker panel, previously described for use in pediatric patients, for identifying adult ED patients with abdominal pain who are at low risk of acute appendicitis. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled subjects >18 years of age presenting to seven U. S. emergency departmentswith <72 hours of abdominal pain suggesting possible acute appendicitis. The APPY1 panelwas performed on blood samples drawn from each patient at the time of initial evaluation and results were correlated with the final diagnosis either positive or negative for acute appendicitis. Results: 431 patientswere enrolled with 422 completing all aspects of the study. The APPY1 biomarker panel exhibited a sensitivity of 97.5% (95% CI, 91.3-99.3%), a negative predictive value of 98.4% (95% CI, 94.4-99.6%), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.07 (95% CI, 0.02-0.27), with a specificity of 36.5% (95% CI, 31.6-41.8%) for acute appendicitis. The panel correctly identified 125 of 342 (36.6%) patientswho did not have appendicitis with 2 (2.5%) false negatives. The CT utilization rate in this populationwas 72.7% (307/422). Of 307 CT scans, 232were done for patients who did not have appendicitis and 79 (34%) of these patients were correctly identified as negative with "low risk" biomarker panel results, representing 26% (79/307) of all CT scans performed. Conclusion: This biomarker panel exhibited high sensitivity and negative predictive value for acute appendicitis in this prospective adult cohort, thereby potentially reducing the dependence on CT for the evaluation of possible acute appendicitis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 424
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   USEFULNESS OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH LOWER RIGHT QUADRANT PAIN - DIAGNOSTIC VALUE IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
Sebastian, Garcia Jose ;
Federico, Ballario ;
Paula, Tiscornia Maria ;
Robert, Badra ;
Alberto, Marangoni .
REVISTA ARGENTINA DE RESIDENTES DE CIRUGIA, 2012, 17 (01) :29-35
[42]   Low-dose CT for patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis: optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance [J].
Kim, Seung Ho ;
Yoon, Jung-Hee ;
Lee, Jang Hee ;
Lim, Yun-Jung ;
Kim, Ok Hwa ;
Ryu, Ji Hwa ;
Son, Jung-Hee .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (08) :899-907
[43]   Acute Appendicitis and Negative or Inconclusive Results at Initial US in Adult, Pediatric, and Pregnant Patients: What to Do Next? [J].
Laghi, Andrea .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (03) :728-729
[44]   Air ambulance retrievals of patients with suspected appendicitis and acute abdominal pain: The patients' journeys, referral pathways and appendectomy outcomes using linked data in Central Queensland, Australia [J].
Edwards, Kristin H. ;
Edwards, Mark T. ;
Franklin, Richard C. ;
Khanna, Sankalp ;
Kuhnert, Petra M. ;
Jones, Rhondda .
AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2023, 26 (01) :13-23
[45]   The Diagnostic Values of Ischemia-Modified Albumin in Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain and Its Role in Differentiating Acute Abdomen [J].
Yeniocak, Selman ;
Sarac, Fatma ;
Yazicioglu, Mustafa ;
Karabulut, Nadiye ;
Unal, Akin ;
Yucetas, Esma ;
Koldas, Macit ;
Akkoc, Ibrahim ;
Ekici, Mustafa ;
Evrin, Togay .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
[46]   Diagnostic performance of abdominal point of care ultrasound performed by an emergency physician in acute right iliac fossa pain [J].
Bourcier J.-E. ;
Gallard E. ;
Redonnet J.-P. ;
Majourau M. ;
Deshaie D. ;
Bourgeois J.-M. ;
Garnier D. ;
Geeraerts T. .
Critical Ultrasound Journal, 2018, 10 (1)
[47]   Clinical diagnostic accuracy of acute colonic diverticulitis in patients admitted with acute abdominal pain, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis [J].
Talabani, A. Jamal ;
Endreseth, B. H. ;
Lydersen, S. ;
Edna, T. -H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (01) :41-47
[48]   Clinical diagnostic accuracy of acute colonic diverticulitis in patients admitted with acute abdominal pain, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis [J].
A. Jamal Talabani ;
B. H. Endreseth ;
S. Lydersen ;
T.-H. Edna .
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 :41-47
[49]   Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Myeloperoxidase Plasma Levels Compared With Sensitive Troponins in Patients Admitted With Acute Onset Chest Pain [J].
Rudolph, Volker ;
Keller, Till ;
Schulz, Andreas ;
Ojeda, Francisco ;
Rudolph, Tanja K. ;
Tzikas, Stergios ;
Bickel, Christoph ;
Meinertz, Thomas ;
Muenzel, Thomas ;
Blankenberg, Stefan ;
Baldus, Stephan .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR GENETICS, 2012, 5 (05) :561-568
[50]   Should routine spiral computed tomography be performed in adult patients with acute abdominal pain of the right lower quadrant? [J].
Regimbeau, JM ;
Panis, Y ;
Lê, P ;
Soyer, P ;
Kardache, M ;
Rymer, R ;
Valleur, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2003, 18 (02) :126-130