Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography

被引:18
作者
Carvalho Neto, Raimundo Homero [1 ]
Viana Junior, Antonio Brazil [1 ]
Moron, Antonio Fernandes [2 ]
Araujo Junior, Edward [2 ]
Costa Carvalho, Francisco Herlanio [1 ]
Feitosa, Helvecio Neves [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Ceara UFC, Assis Chateaubriand Matern, Maternal Fetal Med Serv, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Sao Paulo EPM UNIFESP, Paulista Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Rua Belchior Azevedo,156 Apto,111 Torre Vitoria, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fortaleza UNIFOR, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
关键词
Cesarean section; labor; prediction; ultrasonography; vaginal delivery; PROLONGED 1ST STAGE; FETAL HEAD; TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND; ACTIVE; 2ND-STAGE; POSITION; STATION; DESCENT; MODE; PARAMETERS; MEMBRANES;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2019.1666818
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the relevance of the angle of progression (AOP) and head-perineum distance (HPD) for predicting the type of delivery and duration of the second stage of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography. Methods: In total, 221 women in labor with a single gestational sac at >= 37 weeks of gestation and fetuses in cephalic presentation underwent two-dimensional ultrasonography by transperineal route for measurements of AOP and HPD. Correlations between the type of delivery (vaginal or surgical (cesarean section and forceps)), duration of the second stage of labor, and fetal and maternal characteristics were assessed. AOP and HPD variables were separately studied in the first and second stages of labor. Multivariate logistic regression was followed in stages to identify the predictors for the surgical delivery outcome - stepwise forward method. Results: In total, 153 (69.2%) women underwent vaginal deliveries, 7 (3.2%) underwent forceps deliveries, and 61 (27.6%) underwent cesarean deliveries. AOP was a statistically significant parameter in first and second stages of labor (107.8 +/- 12.1 degrees versus 100.8 +/- 13.7 degrees; p = .017), with an inverse correlation with the occurrence of vaginal delivery. HPD was a statistically significant parameter in the second stage of labor (3.42 +/- 0.84 cm versus 4.17 +/- 0.54 cm; p < .003), with a direct correlation with the occurrence of surgical delivery. The value of AOP that optimized the curve was 129.9 degrees with 85% specificity and 63% sensitivity for the vaginal delivery endpoint. The value of HPD that optimized the curve was 4.3 cm with 69% specificity and 89% sensitivity for the surgical delivery endpoint. In the first phase, the variables defining the type of delivery were the following: height, body mass index, and AOP. In the second phase, the variables defining were the following: height, labor analgesia, HPD, and position of the fetal occiput. Conclusion: AOP and HPD determined by intrapartum ultrasonography were associated with duration of labor, which may aid in predicting the type of delivery in association with clinical parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:2340 / 2348
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour (Review) [J].
Anim-Somuah, Millicent ;
Smyth, Rebecca M. D. ;
Cyna, Allan M. ;
Cuthbert, Anna .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (05)
[2]   A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound [J].
Barbera, A. F. ;
Pombar, X. ;
Perugino, G. ;
Lezotte, D. C. ;
Hobbins, J. C. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (03) :313-319
[3]   Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study [J].
Burke, Naomi ;
Burke, Gerard ;
Breathnach, Fionnuala ;
McAuliffe, Fionnuala ;
Morrison, John J. ;
Turner, Michael ;
Dornan, Samina ;
Higgins, John R. ;
Cotter, Amanda ;
Geary, Michael ;
McParland, Peter ;
Daly, Sean ;
Cody, Fiona ;
Dicker, Pat ;
Tully, Elizabeth ;
Malone, Fergal D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (06)
[4]   Does occiput posterior position in the second stage of labour increase the operative delivery rate? [J].
Carseldine, Wendy J. ;
Phipps, Hala ;
Zawada, Shannon F. ;
Campbell, Neil T. ;
Ludlow, Joanne P. ;
Krishnan, Surya Y. ;
De Vries, Bradley S. .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 53 (03) :265-270
[5]   Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery [J].
Ciaciura-Jarno, Magdalena ;
Cnota, Wojciech ;
Wojtowicz, Dominik ;
Niesluchowska-Hoxha, Anna ;
Ruci, Aleksandra ;
Kierach, Rafal ;
Stepien, Aleksandra ;
Nowak, Agnieszka ;
Sodowska, Patrycja .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 87 (06) :448-453
[6]   Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique [J].
Dietz, HP ;
Lanzarone, V .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (02) :165-168
[7]   Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise [J].
Dueckelmann, A. M. ;
Bamberg, C. ;
Michaelis, S. A. M. ;
Lange, J. ;
Nonnenmacher, A. ;
Dudenhausen, J. W. ;
Kalache, K. D. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (02) :216-222
[8]   Fetal head position during the second stage of labor:: Comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination [J].
Dupuis, O ;
Ruimark, S ;
Corinne, D ;
Simone, T ;
André, D ;
René-Charles, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 123 (02) :193-197
[9]   Birth simulator: Reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification [J].
Dupuis, O ;
Silveira, R ;
Zentner, A ;
Dittmar, A ;
Gaucherand, P ;
Cucherat, M ;
Redarce, T ;
Rudigoz, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (03) :868-874
[10]   Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor [J].
Eggebo, T. M. ;
Heien, C. ;
Okland, I. ;
Gjessing, L. K. ;
Romundstad, P. ;
Salvesen, K. A. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 32 (02) :199-204