A radiomic-based model of different contrast-enhanced CT phase for differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from inflammatory mass with hepatolithiasis

被引:22
作者
Xue, Beihui [1 ]
Wu, Sunjie [1 ]
Zhang, Mingyue [1 ]
Hong, Junjie [1 ]
Liu, Bole [1 ]
Xu, Nina [1 ]
Zeng, Qiqiang [2 ]
Tang, Kun [1 ]
Zheng, Xiangwu [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); Inflammatory mass(IM); Hepatolithiasis; Radiomics;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03027-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is hard to distinguish from inflammatory mass (IM) complicated with hepatolithiasis in clinical practice preoperatively. This study looked to develop and confirm the radiomics models to make a distinction between ICC with hepatolithiasis from IM and to compare the results of different contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) phase. Methods The models were developed in a training cohort of 110 patients from January 2005 to June 2020. Radiomics features were extracted from both arterial phase and portal venous phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans. The radiomics scores based on radiomics features, were built by logistic regression after using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. The rad-scores of two contrast -enhanced CT phases and clinical features were incorporated into a novel model. The performance of the models were determined by theirs discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. The models were externally validated in 35 consecutive patients. Results The radiomics signature comprised two features in arterial phase (training cohort, AUC = 0.809, sensitivity 0.700, specificity 0.848, and accuracy 0.774;validation cohort, AUC = 0.790, sensitivity 0.714, specificity 0.800, and accuracy 0.757) and three related features in portal venous phase (training cohort, AUC = 0.801, sensitivity 0.800, specificity 0.717, and accuracy 0.759; validation cohort, AUC = 0.830, sensitivity 0.700, specificity 0.750, and accuracy 0.775) showed significant association with ICC in both cohorts (P < 0.05).We also developed a model only based on clinical variables (training cohort, AUC = 0.778, sensitivity 0.567, specificity 0.891, and accuracy 0.729; validation cohort, AUC = 0.788, sensitivity 0.571, specificity 0.950, and accuracy 0.761). The radiomics-based model contained rad-score of two phases and two clinical factors (CEA and CA19-9) showed the best performance (training cohort, AUC = 0.864, sensitivity 0.867, specificity 0.804, and accuracy 0.836; validation cohort, AUC = 0.843, sensitivity 0.643, specificity 0.980, and accuracy 0.821). Conclusions Our radiomics-based models provided a diagnostic tool for differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from inflammatory mass (IM) with hepatolithiasis both in arterial phase and portal venous phase. To go a step further, the diagnostic accuracy will improved by a clinico-radiologic model.
引用
收藏
页码:3835 / 3844
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma
    Ben-Menachem, Tamir
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 19 (08) : 615 - 617
  • [2] CT radiomics and PET radiomics: ready for clinical implementation?
    Bogowicz, Marta
    Vuong, Diem
    Huellner, Martin W.
    Pavic, Matea
    Andratschke, Nicolaus
    Gabrys, Hubert S.
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 63 (04) : 355 - 370
  • [3] Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Bridgewater, John
    Galle, Peter R.
    Khan, Shahid A.
    Llovet, Josep M.
    Park, Joong-Won
    Patel, Tushar
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Gores, Gregory J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 60 (06) : 1268 - 1289
  • [4] A novel nomogram for the prediction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with intrahepatic lithiasis complicated by imagiologically diagnosed mass
    Chen, Gang
    Yu, Huajun
    Wang, Yi
    Li, Chenhao
    Zhou, Mengtao
    Yu, Zhengping
    Zheng, Xiangwu
    Wu, Xiuling
    Shan, Yunfeng
    Zhang, Qiyu
    Zeng, Qiqiang
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 847 - 856
  • [5] Evaluation of CT-based radiomics signature and nomogram as prognostic markers in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    Chen, Linyan
    Wang, Haiyang
    Zeng, Hao
    Zhang, Yi
    Ma, Xuelei
    [J]. CANCER IMAGING, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Chen M F, 1999, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, V6, P136, DOI 10.1007/s005340050096
  • [7] Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (cholangiocellular carcinoma): Clinical features, diagnosis and treatment
    Chen, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 14 (12) : 1144 - 1149
  • [8] CHEN MF, 1989, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V84, P391
  • [9] Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of recent advances and challenges
    Das, Vishal
    Kalita, Jatin
    Pal, Mintu
    [J]. BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 87 : 8 - 19
  • [10] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845