A Benchmark of Electric Vehicle Load and Occupancy Models for Day-Ahead Forecasting on Open Charging Session Data

被引:14
作者
Amara-Ouali, Yvenn [1 ]
Goude, Yannig [2 ]
Hamrouche, Bachir [2 ]
Bishara, Matthew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay LMO, INRIA, CELESTE, Orsay, France
[2] EDF R&D, Palaiseau, France
[3] EDF Inc, Los Altos, CA USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 THE THIRTEENTH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS, E-ENERGY 2022 | 2022年
关键词
Machine Learning; Statistical Modelling; Aggregation of experts; Smart Charging; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1145/3538637.3538850
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The development of electric vehicles (EV) is a major lever towards low carbon transportation. It comes with increasing numbers of charging infrastructures which can be smartly managed to control the CO2 cost of EV electricity consumption or used as flexible assets for grid management. To achieve that, an efficient day-ahead forecast of charging behaviours is required at different spatial resolutions (e.g., household and public stations). We propose an extensive benchmark of 14 models for both load and occupancy day-ahead forecasts, covering 8 open charging session datasets of different types (residential, workplace and public stations). Two modelling approaches are compared: direct and bottom-up. The direct approach forecasts the aggregated load (resp. occupation) directly of an area/station whereas the bottom-up approach models each individual EV charging session before aggregating them. This second approach is key to the effective implementation of smart charging strategies. We consider both machine learning models (Random Forests and Gated Recurrent Units) and statistical models (Generalised Additive Models, Poisson Regression, Mixture Regression, Auto-Regressive) in order to maximise the spectrum of our benchmark. We finally propose an adaptive aggregation strategy to assess the variety of forecasts at hand. Overall, we demonstrate that direct approaches reach better performances than bottom-up approaches across all datasets considered. We further show that the different approaches used can lead to an improved performance of direct approaches when using an adaptive aggregation strategy. In fact, our best model produces a forecast which is more than 5 times better relative to the persistence on residential data.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 207
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Amara-Ouali Yvenn, 2021, e-Energy '21: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Future Energy Systems, P278, DOI 10.1145/3447555.3466568
[2]   A Review of Electric Vehicle Load Open Data and Models [J].
Amara-Ouali, Yvenn ;
Goude, Yannig ;
Massart, Pascal ;
Poggi, Jean-Michel ;
Yan, Hui .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (08)
[3]  
Box G. E. P., 1976, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, VRev. ed, DOI DOI 10.2307/3150485
[4]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[5]  
Breiman L, 1996, MACH LEARN, V24, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1018054314350
[6]  
Breiman L., 1984, Classification and Regression Trees, V1st, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9781315139470, 10.1201/9781315139470]
[7]   Online Learning Algorithms [J].
Cesa-Bianchi, Nicolo ;
Orabona, Francesco .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 8, 2021, 2021, 8 :165-190
[8]  
Cesa-Bianchi Nicolo, 2006, Prediction, Learning, and Games, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511546921
[9]  
Chung Junyoung, 2014, ARXIV
[10]  
Daley DJ., 2008, INTRO THEORY POINT P, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-49835-5, 10.1007/978-0-387-49835-5]