Meta-performance evaluation of sustainability indicators

被引:113
作者
Ramos, Tomas B. [1 ]
Caeiro, Sandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, CENSE, Ctr Environm & Sustainabil Res, Fac Sci & Technol, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal
[2] Portuguese Distance Learning Univ, IMAR Inst Marine Res, Dept Sci & Technol, P-1000132 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Sustainable development; Environmental; Indicators; Meta-evaluation; Performance; Validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.008
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There are many different kinds of frameworks for evaluating environmental and sustainability performance at the organizational level (profit or not-for-profit, private or public), sectoral level (e.g. industry, transport, agriculture and tourism), and local, regional or country levels. Despite the diversity of methods and tools to measure sustainable development, indicators are one of the approaches most used. However, these tools do not usually include evaluation of the performance measurement instrument itself. The main objective of this research is to develop a conceptual framework to design and assess the effectiveness of the sustainability indicators themselves. To put the proposed tool into practice, a set of key good-practice factors and meta-performance evaluation indicators is proposed for adoption in a national case study-the national sustainable development indicators system, SIDS Portugal, and the usefulness of this methodology is demonstrated. This approach aims to evaluate how appropriate a set of sustainability indicators is and allow an evaluation of overall performance-monitoring activities and results. Stakeholder involvement is an essential component of the proposed framework. The tool developed Could support continuous improvement in the performance of ongoing sustainability indicator initiatives, allowing greater guidance, objectivity and transparency in sustainability assessment processes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 166
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]  
Ott W. R., 1978, ENV QUALITY INDICES
[32]   Characterizing and measuring sustainable development [J].
Parris, TM ;
Kates, RW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2003, 28 :559-586
[33]   A meta-evaluation, or quality assessment, of the evaluations in this issue, based on the African Evaluation Guidelines: 2002 [J].
Patel, M .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2002, 25 (04) :329-332
[34]  
RAMOS TB, 2007, 222005 U ALG I AMB
[35]   Environmental performance policy indicators for the public sector: The case of the defence sector [J].
Ramos, Tomas B. ;
Alves, Ines ;
Subtil, Rui ;
Joanaz de Melo, Joao .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 82 (04) :410-432
[36]   Environmental and sustainability impact assessment in small islands: the case of Azores and Madeira [J].
Ramos, Tomas B. ;
Caeiro, Sandra ;
Douglas, Calbert H. ;
Ochieng, Cocker .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 10 (02) :223-240
[37]   Development of regional sustainability indicators and the role of academia in this process: the Portuguese practice [J].
Ramos, Tomas B. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (12) :1101-1115
[38]  
Rapport D.J., 1979, COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEW, P11
[39]  
*RIVM UNEP, 1997, 4020017 RIVM UNEP
[40]   Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national level sustainable development indicators in Finland [J].
Rosenstrom, Uall ;
Kyllonen, Simo .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 84 (03) :282-298