Modelling the influence of soil carbon on net greenhouse gas emissions from grazed pastures

被引:9
|
作者
Meyer, Rachelle [1 ,2 ]
Cullen, Brendan R. [1 ]
Eckard, Richard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Australian German Coll Climate & Energy Transit, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
agro-ecosystem; methane; net carbon balance; nitrous oxide; sequestration; services; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSION; ORGANIC-MATTER; LAND-USE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SEQUESTRATION; MITIGATION; SYSTEMS; PRODUCTIVITY; AGRICULTURE; GRASSLAND;
D O I
10.1071/AN15508
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Sequestering carbon (C) in soil organic matter in grassland systems is often cited as a major opportunity to offset greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, these systems are typically grazed by ruminants, leading to uncertainties in the net GHG balance that may be achieved. We used a pasture model to investigate the net balance between methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and soil C in sheep-grazed pasture systems with two starting amounts of soil C. The net emissions were calculated for four soil types in two rainfall zones over three periods of 19 years. Because of greater pasture productivity, and consequent higher sheep stocking rates, high-rainfall sites were associated with greater GHG emissions that could not be offset by C sequestration. On these high-rainfall sites, the higher rate of soil organic carbon (SOC) increase on low-SOC soils offset an average of 45% of the livestock GHG emissions on the modelled chromosol and 32% on the modelled vertosol. The slow rate of SOC increase on the high-SOC soils only offset 2-4% of CH4 and N2O emissions on these high-rainfall sites. On low-rainfall sites, C sequestration in low-SOC soils more than offset livestock GHG emissions, whereas the modelled high-C soils offset 75-86% of CH4 and N2O emissions. Greater net emissions on high-C soils were due primarily to reduced sequestration potential and greater N2O emissions from nitrogen mineralisation and livestock urine. Annual variation in CH4 and N2O emissions was low, whereas annual SOC change showed high annual variation, which was more strongly correlated with weather variables on the low-rainfall sites compared with the high-rainfall sites. At low-soil C concentrations, with high sequestration potential, there is an initial mitigation benefit that can in some instances offset enteric CH4 and direct and indirect N2O emissions. However, as soil organic matter increases there is a trade-off between diminishing GHG offsets and increasing ecosystem services, including mineralisation and productivity benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 593
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variability of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Relation to Economic and Ecological Indicators from Cattle Farms
    Sieczko, Leszek
    Koloszko-Chomentowska, Zofia
    Sieczko, Anna
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (08)
  • [42] Greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in a rain-fed rice field with crop rotation management
    Cha-un, Nittaya
    Chidthaisong, Amnat
    Yagi, Kazuyuki
    Sudo, Shigeto
    Towprayoon, Sirintornthep
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 237 : 109 - 120
  • [43] Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil organic carbon poor calcareous loamy soil from Central China Plain
    Zhang, Afeng
    Liu, Yuming
    Pan, Genxing
    Hussain, Qaiser
    Li, Lianqing
    Zheng, Jinwei
    Zhang, Xuhui
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2012, 351 (1-2) : 263 - 275
  • [44] Greenhouse gas emissions from a managed grassland
    Jones, SK
    Rees, RM
    Skiba, UM
    Ball, BC
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2005, 47 (2-4) : 201 - 211
  • [45] Modeling Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture
    Barbulescu, Alina
    ATMOSPHERE, 2025, 16 (03)
  • [46] Economic factors influence net carbon emissions of forest bioenergy expansion
    Favero, Alice
    Baker, Justin
    Sohngen, Brent
    Daigneault, Adam
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [47] Biochar Mitigates Greenhouse Gas Emissions from an Acidic Tea Soil
    Wang, Hong
    Yi, Huaiting
    Zhang, Xiao
    Su, Wei
    Li, Xinwei
    Zhang, Yaojun
    Gao, Xiang
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2020, 29 (01): : 323 - 330
  • [48] GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM A CHINAMPA SOIL OR FLOATING GARDENS IN MEXICO
    Livia Ortiz-Cornejo, Nadia
    Luna-Guido, Marco
    Rivera-Espinoza, Yadira
    Soledad Vasquez-Murrieta, Maria
    Manuel Ruiz-Valdiviezo, Victor
    Dendooven, Luc
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE CONTAMINACION AMBIENTAL, 2015, 31 (04): : 343 - 350
  • [49] Predicting Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Carbon from Changing Pasture to an Energy Crop
    Duval, Benjamin D.
    Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J.
    Davis, Sarah C.
    Keogh, Cindy
    Long, Stephen P.
    Parton, William J.
    DeLucia, Evan H.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [50] Impact of Biochar on Manure Carbon Stabilization and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Rogovska, Natalia
    Laird, David
    Cruse, Richard
    Fleming, Pierce
    Parkin, Tim
    Meek, David
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (03) : 871 - 879