The "make or take" decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidity

被引:209
作者
Bloomfield, R
O'Hara, M [1 ]
Saar, G
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Johnson Grad Sch Management, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Leonard N Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
关键词
microstructure; limit orders; liquidity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.07.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper uses experimental asset markets to investigate the evolution of liquidity in an electronic limit order market. Our market setting includes salient features of electronic limit order markets, as well as informed traders and liquidity traders. We focus on the strategies of the traders and how these are affected by trader type, characteristics of the market, and characteristics of the asset. We find that informed traders use more limit orders than do liquidity traders. Our main result is that liquidity provision shifts as trading progresses, with informed traders increasingly providing liquidity in markets. The change in the behavior of the informed traders seems to be in response to the dynamic adjustment of prices to information; they take (provide) liquidity when the value of their information is high (low). Thus, a market-making role emerges endogenously in our electronic markets and is ultimately adopted by the traders who are least subject to adverse selection when placing limit orders. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 199
页数:35
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Limit orders, depth, and volatility: Evidence from the stock exchange of Hong Kong [J].
Ahn, HJ ;
Bae, KH ;
Chan, K .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (02) :767-788
[2]  
ANGEL JJ, 1994, UNPUB LIMIT VERSUS M
[3]   Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors [J].
Barber, BM ;
Odean, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (02) :773-806
[4]  
BARCLAY M, 2002, UNPUB INFROMATION TR
[5]   AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE LIMIT ORDER BOOK AND THE ORDER FLOW IN THE PARIS BOURSE [J].
BIAIS, B ;
HILLION, P ;
SPATT, C .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1995, 50 (05) :1655-1689
[6]   Does order preferencing matter? [J].
Bloomfield, R ;
O'Hara, M .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 50 (01) :3-37
[7]   Can transparent markets survive? [J].
Bloomfield, R ;
O'Hara, M .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 55 (03) :425-459
[8]   PERIODIC MARKET CLOSURE AND TRADING VOLUME - A MODEL OF INTRADAY BIDS AND ASKS [J].
BROCK, WA ;
KLEIDON, AW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1992, 16 (3-4) :451-489
[9]   The opportunity for conspiracy in asset markets organized with dealer intermediaries [J].
Cason, TN .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2000, 13 (02) :385-416
[10]   AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF MARKET AND LIMIT ORDERS [J].
CHAKRAVARTY, S ;
HOLDEN, CW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 1995, 4 (03) :213-241