Quality of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care: Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Wound Care Clinic Using an Extended Donabedian Model Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:3
作者
Patry, Jerome [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Tourigny, Andre [1 ,3 ]
Mercier, Marie-Philippe [2 ,4 ]
Dionne, Clermont E. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Rech CISSS Chaudiere Appalaches, 143 Rue Wolfe, Levis, PQ G6V 3Z1, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Hop St Sacrement, Axe Sante Populat & Prat Optimales Sante,CHU Queb, Ctr Excellence Vieillissement Quebec CEVQ,Ctr Rec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Podiatr Med Program, Dept Phys Act Sci, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Rehabil, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
diabetic foot ulcer; Donabedian; interdisciplinary team; quality of care; wound care; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE; INTER-SOCIETY CONSENSUS; IWGDF GUIDANCE; OF-CARE; LOWER-EXTREMITY; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFICATION; INTERVENTIONS; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.09.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), a serious complication of diabetes, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and presents a substantial socioeconomic burden. However, DFU quality of care has been insufficiently studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of DFU care at an interdisciplinary wound care clinic in Canada, based on an extended Donabedian model: structure, process and outcome quality indicators combined with patient characteristics. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 140 adult patients with diabetes who were treated between 2012 and 2018 at a wound care clinic in a university-affiliated hospital in the Qu & eacute;bec City area of Canada. Twenty-two internationally recognized quality-of-care indicators were identified from the literature. Data were collected from medical files, and the results were used to document the selected quality-of-care indicators. Results: The principal indicators regarding structure and process were met, and outcome indicators were influenced by study population characteristics, particularly peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia. Moreover, this study highlights that quality-of-care indicators are essential when evaluating DFU outcomes, as structure and process indicators can also affect wound healing outcomes. Conclusions: This study suggests that DFU care at a Canadian wound care clinic, with an interdisciplinary approach, meets most quality-of-care indicators. The socioeconomic burden of DFUs for patients, health-care organizations and policymakers, and the paucity of quality and performance evaluations, call for more studies evaluating DFU care. (c) 2020 Canadian Diabetes Association.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] ACT Academy, 2018, ONL LIB QUAL SERV IM
  • [2] Quality of care: measuring a neglected driver of improved health
    Akachi, Yoko
    Kruk, Margaret E.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2017, 95 (06) : 465 - 472
  • [3] American Diabetes Association, 1999, Diabetes Care, V22, P1354
  • [4] Amir Y, 2017, OSTOMY WOUND MANAG, V63, P8
  • [5] Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence
    Armstrong, David G.
    Boulton, Andrew J. M.
    Bus, Sicco A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (24) : 2367 - 2375
  • [6] The 2015 IWGDF guidance documents on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: development of an evidence-based global consensus
    Bakker, K.
    Apelqvist, J.
    Lipsky, B. A.
    Van Netten, J. J.
    Schaper, N. C.
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2016, 32 : 2 - 6
  • [7] Beaumier M, 2018, HOTEL DIEU LEVIS CHR
  • [8] Blanchette V, 2019, THESIS U MONTREAL
  • [9] Botros M, 2017, Best practice recommendations for the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers
  • [10] The impact of the multidisciplinary team in the management of individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review
    Buggy, A.
    Moore, Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2017, 26 (06) : 324 - 339