Is a Distal Resection Margin of ≤ 1 cm Safe in Patients with Intermediate- to Low-Lying Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
作者
Yan, Han [1 ]
Wang, Peng-Yuan [1 ]
Wu, Ying-Chao [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Cun [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Xishiku St 8, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Distal resection margin; Rectal cancer; Meta-analysis; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; INTRAMURAL SPREAD; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOWER; 3RD; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-022-05342-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is generally accepted that the distal resection margin of intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer should be greater than 2 cm and at least 1 cm in special cases. This study intends to investigate whether a distal resection margin <= 1 cm affects tumor outcomes for patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Sixteen studies included data for distal resection margins <= 1 cm (1684 cases) and > 1 cm (5877 cases), and 5 studies included survival data. Meta-analysis was used to compare the local recurrence rate and long-term survival of patients with distal resection margins > or <= 1 cm. Results The local recurrence rate in the <= 1-cm margin group (9.5%) was 2.3% higher than that in the > 1-cm margin group (7.2%) according to a fixed-effects model (RR [95% CI] 1.42 [1.18, 1.70], P < 0.001). The overall survival results of the five 1-cm margin studies showed an HR (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.75, 1.24) (P = 0.78). Subgroup analysis showed that the local recurrence rate in the subgroup with perioperative treatment was 1.2% lower in the <= 1-cm margin group (8.3%) than in the > 1-cm margin group (9.5%) (RR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.63, 1.49], P = 0.90). In the surgery alone subgroup, the local recurrence rate was 4.7% higher in the <= 1-cm margin group (12.4%) than in the > 1-cm group (7.7%) (RR [95% CI] 1.76 [1.09, 2.83], P = 0.02). Conclusions For patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer undergoing surgery alone, a distal resection margin <= 1 cm may be not safe.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1803
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Close distal margins do not increase rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-saving surgery without neoadjuvant therapy
    Lim, Jason Wei-Min
    Chew, Min-Hoe
    Lim, Kiat-Hon
    Tang, Choong-Leong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (10) : 1285 - 1294
  • [22] The minimum distal resection margin in rectal cancer surgery and its impact on local recurrence - A retrospective cohort analysis
    Manegold, Philipp
    Taukert, Johannes
    Neeff, Hannes
    Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan
    Thomusch, Oliver
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 69 : 77 - 83
  • [23] Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm
    Martling, AL
    Holm, T
    Rutqvist, LE
    Moran, BJ
    Heald, RJ
    Cedermark, B
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9224) : 93 - 96
  • [24] Presence of distal intramural spread after preoperative combined-modality therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum: What is now the appropriate distal resection margin?
    Mezhir, JJ
    Smith, KD
    Fichera, A
    Hart, J
    Posner, MC
    Hurst, RD
    [J]. SURGERY, 2005, 138 (04) : 658 - 663
  • [25] Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy
    Moore, HG
    Riedel, E
    Minsky, BD
    Saltz, L
    Paty, P
    Wong, D
    Cohen, AM
    Guillem, JG
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [26] What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?
    Nagtegaal, Iris D.
    Quirke, Phil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (02) : 303 - 312
  • [27] Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery
    Nelson, H
    Petrelli, N
    Carlin, A
    Couture, J
    Fleshman, J
    Guillem, J
    Miedema, B
    Ota, D
    Sargent, D
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (08): : 583 - 596
  • [28] O'Neill B, 2008, CLIN MED INSIGHTS-ON, V2, P135
  • [29] Altering the therapeutic paradigm towards a distal bowel margin of &lt; 1 cm in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: a systematic review and commentary
    Pahlman, L.
    Bujko, K.
    Rutkowski, A.
    Michalski, W.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (04) : E166 - E174
  • [30] Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer A Comparative Study With Laparoscopic Surgery
    Park, Eun Jung
    Cho, Min Soo
    Baek, Se Jin
    Hur, Hyuk
    Min, Byung Soh
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Lee, Kang Young
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (01) : 129 - 137