Effects of Vocabulary and Phonotactic Probability on 2-Year-Olds' Nonword Repetition

被引:9
作者
Verhagen, Josje [1 ]
de Bree, Elise [2 ]
Mulder, Hanna [1 ]
Leseman, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, POB 80140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Nonword repetition; Vocabulary; Phonotactic probability; 2-Year-olds; Phonological representations; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; LANGUAGE-DEVELOPMENT; WORKING-MEMORY; CHILDREN; WORD; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; 4-YEAR-OLD; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10936-016-9448-9
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study investigates the relationship between nonword repetition (NWR) and vocabulary in 2-year-olds. Questions addressed are whether (1) NWR and vocabulary are associated, (2) phonotactic probability affects NWR, and (3) there is an interaction effect between phonotactic probability and vocabulary on NWR performance. The general aim of the study is to investigate whether NWR, as a task of phonological storage, assesses the quality of phonological representations in children as young as 2 years of age. 557 Dutch 2-year-olds performed a NWR task containing items of varying phonotactic probability as well as a receptive vocabulary task. The results showed a moderate, significant correlation between NWR and vocabulary. Phonotactic probability had an effect on NWR performance. Further analyses showed that there was a significant interaction between phonotactic probability and vocabulary for part of the items. These results support previously reported effects of vocabulary and phonotactic probability on NWR in older, English-speaking children for a large sample of Dutch-speaking 2-year-olds, and provide evidence that NWR assesses the quality of phonological representations already in very young children.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 524
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PHONOTACTOOLS TEST V
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]   The phonological loop as a language learning device [J].
Baddeley, A ;
Gathercole, S ;
Papagno, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (01) :158-173
[4]  
Beers M., 1995, THESIS
[5]   Nonword repetition and young children's receptive vocabulary: A longitudinal study [J].
Bowey, JA .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2001, 22 (03) :441-469
[6]   The preschool repetition test: An evaluation of performance in typically developing and clinically referred children [J].
Chiat, Shula ;
Roy, Penny .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2007, 50 (02) :429-443
[7]   The developmental trajectory of nonword repetition [J].
Chiat, Shula .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2006, 27 (04) :552-556
[8]   Young children's sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon [J].
Coady, JA ;
Aslin, RN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (03) :183-213
[9]  
Daelemans W., 1994, Computational Linguistics, V20, P421
[10]   Word stress production in three-year-old children at risk of dyslexia [J].
de Bree, Elise ;
Wijnen, Frank ;
Zonneveld, Wim .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2006, 29 (03) :304-317