Union shareholder activism in the context of declining labour law protection: four Australian case studies

被引:7
作者
Anderson, Kirsten
Ramsay, Ian
Marshall, Shelley
Mitchell, Richard
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Corp Governance & Workpl Partnerships Project, Sch Law, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Business Law & Taxat, Melbourne, Vic 3145, Australia
关键词
union shareholder activism; corporate governance; industrial relations; labour law;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00541.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the face of declining prominence and influence under industrial relations laws regulating Australian workplaces, Australian trade unions appear increasingly to be directing their attention to Corporations Law as a mechanism for pursuing union and employee "voice" within corporate business organisation. This paper undertakes an examination of four recent "union shareholder" campaigns, the circumstances in which they were undertaken, the objectives of the "union shareholder" strategies and the outcomes of the campaigns. The paper also opens up for consideration whether union shareholder activism is merely a new strategy for pursuing conventional industrial aims, or whether it potentially represents a move by unions to identify themselves as "insiders" with a dual interest in the profitability and governance of the corporation as both shareholders and stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 56
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Anderson K, 2006, CO SECUR LAW J, V24, P279
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, LABOUR LAW
  • [3] BOTTOMLY S, 2006, NEW CORPORATE ACCOUN
  • [4] Cooney S., 2006, ECON LABOUR RELAT RE, V16, P155, DOI DOI 10.1177/103530460601600207
  • [5] Cooney S, 2006, U NSW LAW J, V29, P215
  • [6] Fenwick C., 2006, ECON LABOUR RELAT RE, V16, P85
  • [7] Fetter J, 2006, Australian Journal of Labour Law, V19, P210
  • [8] Forsyth A., 2006, Australian Journal of Labour Law, V19, P183
  • [9] Gollan P, 2002, WORKS COUNCILS AUSTR
  • [10] GOLLAN P, 2003, PARTNERSHIP WORK CHA