Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients receiving potentially curative treatment for oesophageal cancer

被引:10
作者
Quinn, Lauren M. [1 ]
Hollis, Alexander C. [1 ]
Hodson, James [2 ]
Elshafie, Mona A. [3 ]
Hallissey, Mike T. [4 ]
Whiting, John L. [4 ]
Griffiths, Ewen A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Inst Translat Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Histopathol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Inst Canc & Genom Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
EJSO | 2018年 / 44卷 / 08期
关键词
Oesophageal cancer; Oesophagectomy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival; Recurrence; SURVIVAL FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA; CRITERIA; STRATIFICATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The utility of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) status in predicting prognosis in oesophageal cancer is controversial, with different definitions used by the College of American Pathologists and the Royal College of Pathologists. We aimed to determine prognostic significance of CRM involvement and evaluate which system is the best predictor of prognosis. Methods: A cohort of 390 patients who had potentially curative oesophagectomy (- + neoadjuvant chemotherapy) were analysed. Associations between CRM involvement and patient outcome were assessed for the whole cohort, and for pre-specified subgroups of T3 tumours and those who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: CRM-involvement was associated with higher T and N stage, tumour differentiation, increased tumour length and both lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Overall Survival (OS) and Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) significantly worsened with CRM-involvement (p = 0.001, p < 0.001). R1 a (<1 mm but no macroscopic involvement) resulted in significantly improved OS (p = 0.037) and RFS (P = 0.026) compared to R1 b (macroscopic involvement), but did not differ significantly from R0 (>= 1 mm). The association between CRM-involvement and both OS and RFS remained significant regardless of whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given. However, CRM-involvement was not a significant prognostic marker in T3 patients (p = 0.148). Multivariable analysis found N stage, lymphovascular invasion, patient age and neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be significantly predictive of patient outcome. CRM-involvement was not a significant independent prognostic marker. Conclusions: CRM-involvement was not found to be independently predictive of prognosis, after accounting for other prognostic markers. As such, CRM should not be considered a major prognostic factor in patients with oesophageal cancer. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1277
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]  
Gilbert F, 2002, CANC REPORT 1997 200
[12]   The prognostic value of circumferential resection in oesophageal malignancy [J].
Griffiths, E. A. ;
Brummell, Z. ;
Gorthi, G. ;
Pritchard, S. A. ;
Welch, I. M. .
EJSO, 2006, 32 (04) :413-419
[13]   Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: Significance of microscopically positive circumferential radial margins [J].
Harvin, John A. ;
Lahat, Guy ;
Correa, Arlene M. ;
Lee, Jared ;
Maru, Dipen ;
Ajani, Jaffer ;
Marom, Edith M. ;
Welsh, James ;
Bhutani, Manoop S. ;
Walsh, Garret ;
Roth, Jack ;
Mehran, Reza ;
Vaporciyan, Ara ;
Rice, David ;
Swisher, Stephen ;
Hofstetter, Wayne .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 143 (02) :412-420
[14]   Systematic review of the surgical strategies of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction [J].
Haverkamp, L. ;
Ruurda, J. P. ;
van Leeuwen, M. S. ;
Siersema, P. D. ;
van Hillegersberg, R. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2014, 23 (04) :222-228
[15]   Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy [J].
Hulshoff, J. B. ;
Faiz, Z. ;
Karrenbeld, A. ;
Kats-Ugurlu, G. ;
Burgerhof, J. G. M. ;
Smit, J. K. ;
Plukker, J. Th. M. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 :S1301-S1309
[16]  
JEMAL A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P134, DOI [DOI 10.3322/caac.20115, DOI 10.3322/CAAC.20107]
[17]   Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience [J].
Khan, Misbah ;
Muzaffar, Anam ;
Syed, Aamir Ali ;
Khatak, Shahid ;
Khan, Ali Raza ;
Ashraf, Muhammad Ijaz .
UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2016, 68 (04) :343-349
[18]   Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer [J].
Khan, OA ;
Fitzgerald, JJ ;
Soomro, I ;
Beggs, FD ;
Morgan, WE ;
Duffy, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (10) :1549-1552
[19]   The presence of lymphovascular and perineural infiltration after neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy identifies patients at high risk for recurrence [J].
Lagarde, S. M. ;
Phillips, A. W. ;
Navidi, M. ;
Disep, B. ;
Immanuel, A. ;
Griffin, S. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 113 (10) :1427-1433
[20]   New 3-Tiered Circumferential Resection Margin Criteria in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J].
Lee, Geun Dong ;
Lee, Seung Eun ;
Kim, Kyoung-Mee ;
Kim, Yong-Hee ;
Ahn, Joong Hyun ;
Jung, Sinho ;
Choi, Yoon-La ;
Kim, Hyeong Ryul ;
Park, Seung-Il ;
Shim, Young Mog .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (06) :965-971