Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients receiving potentially curative treatment for oesophageal cancer

被引:10
作者
Quinn, Lauren M. [1 ]
Hollis, Alexander C. [1 ]
Hodson, James [2 ]
Elshafie, Mona A. [3 ]
Hallissey, Mike T. [4 ]
Whiting, John L. [4 ]
Griffiths, Ewen A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Inst Translat Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Histopathol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Inst Canc & Genom Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
EJSO | 2018年 / 44卷 / 08期
关键词
Oesophageal cancer; Oesophagectomy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival; Recurrence; SURVIVAL FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA; CRITERIA; STRATIFICATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The utility of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) status in predicting prognosis in oesophageal cancer is controversial, with different definitions used by the College of American Pathologists and the Royal College of Pathologists. We aimed to determine prognostic significance of CRM involvement and evaluate which system is the best predictor of prognosis. Methods: A cohort of 390 patients who had potentially curative oesophagectomy (- + neoadjuvant chemotherapy) were analysed. Associations between CRM involvement and patient outcome were assessed for the whole cohort, and for pre-specified subgroups of T3 tumours and those who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: CRM-involvement was associated with higher T and N stage, tumour differentiation, increased tumour length and both lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Overall Survival (OS) and Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) significantly worsened with CRM-involvement (p = 0.001, p < 0.001). R1 a (<1 mm but no macroscopic involvement) resulted in significantly improved OS (p = 0.037) and RFS (P = 0.026) compared to R1 b (macroscopic involvement), but did not differ significantly from R0 (>= 1 mm). The association between CRM-involvement and both OS and RFS remained significant regardless of whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given. However, CRM-involvement was not a significant prognostic marker in T3 patients (p = 0.148). Multivariable analysis found N stage, lymphovascular invasion, patient age and neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be significantly predictive of patient outcome. CRM-involvement was not a significant independent prognostic marker. Conclusions: CRM-involvement was not found to be independently predictive of prognosis, after accounting for other prognostic markers. As such, CRM should not be considered a major prognostic factor in patients with oesophageal cancer. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1277
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Prognostic value of added stratification of circumferential resection margin status in oesophageal carcinoma
    Ahmad, Jawad
    Loughrey, Maurice B.
    Donnelly, David
    Ranaghan, Lisa
    Shah, Rajeev
    Napolitano, Giulio
    Kennedy, Andrew J.
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 62 (05) : 752 - 763
  • [2] Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial of Surgery With or Without Preoperative Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer
    Allum, William H.
    Stenning, Sally P.
    Bancewicz, John
    Clark, Peter I.
    Langley, Ruth E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) : 5062 - 5067
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, SURG PATH CANC CAS S
  • [4] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer
    Chan, D. S. Y.
    Reid, T. D.
    Howell, I.
    Lewis, W. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (04) : 456 - 464
  • [5] Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer
    Cunningham, David
    Allum, William H.
    Stenning, Sally P.
    Thompson, Jeremy N.
    Van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Nicolson, Marianne
    Scarffe, J. Howard
    Lofts, Fiona J.
    Falk, Stephen J.
    Iveson, Timothy J.
    Smith, David B.
    Langley, Ruth E.
    Verma, Monica
    Weeden, Simon
    Chua, Yu Jo
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [6] Assessment of Criteria and Clinical Significance of Circumferential Resection Margins in Esophageal Cancer
    Deeter, Matthew
    Dorer, Russell
    Kuppusamy, Madhan Kumar
    Koehler, Richard P.
    Low, Donald E.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (07) : 618 - 624
  • [7] Devesa SS, 1998, CANCER, V83, P2049, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981115)83:10<2049::AID-CNCR1>3.3.CO
  • [8] 2-U
  • [9] Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer
    Dexter, SPL
    Sue-Ling, H
    McMahon, MJ
    Quirke, P
    Mapstone, N
    Martin, IG
    [J]. GUT, 2001, 48 (05) : 667 - 670
  • [10] Ghadban T, 2016, ANN SURG, V1