Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results

被引:13
|
作者
Cacaci, Claudio [1 ]
Cantner, Friederike [1 ]
Muecke, Thomas [2 ]
Randelzhofer, Peter [1 ]
Hajto, Jan [3 ]
Beuer, Florian [4 ]
机构
[1] Weinstr 4, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[3] Briennerstr 7, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Charite Berlin, Dept Prosthodont Geriatr Dent & Craniomandibular, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Implat; Implant-supported crown; Screw retention; Cementation; Single crown; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; ALL-CERAMIC RESTORATIONS; MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH; LOAD-BEARING CAPACITY; LEAST; YEARS; COMPLICATION RATES; PARTIAL DENTURES; Y-TZP; DIFFERENT COMPONENTS; OBSERVATION PERIOD;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-016-1982-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate the clinical performance of implant-supported zirconia crowns with a sintered veneering cap. Furthermore, the influence of the type of retention (screw-retained vs cemented single crowns) was analysed. Materials and methods Fifty-eight patients were accommodated with 114 implants, inserted in the molar and premolar regions. Zirconia-based crowns with a sintered veneering cap were either screw-retained (n = 53) or cemented (n = 61) on the implant. Recalls were performed every 6 months. The state of soft tissue was documented by the modified plaque and gingiva index (mPI) and sulcus bleeding index (mSBI). The restorations were evaluated for technical failures like veneering porcelain fractures, surface qualities and marginal fitting. Results Neither implant loss nor crown fractures occurred. After a mean clinical service time of 36.9 months, fractures of the veneering porcelain were registered in 1.8 % of the cases. The Kaplan-Meier survival probability regarding eventless restorations was 98.2 %. Chipping of the veneering porcelain was registered in two cemented crowns without statistical influence of the type of retention. The indices showed healthy soft periimplant tissues in both groups. Conclusions Implant-supported zirconia crowns with a sintered veneering cap demonstrated good clinical performance. The type of retention had no influence on technical complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1953 / 1959
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results
    Claudio Cacaci
    Friederike Cantner
    Thomas Mücke
    Peter Randelzhofer
    Jan Hajtó
    Florian Beuer
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2017, 21 : 1953 - 1959
  • [2] Cemented versus screw-retained posterior implant-supported single crowns: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Rittich, Anne
    Gross, Karin
    Hartkamp, Oliver
    von der Stueck, Annabelle
    Raith, Stefan
    Reich, Sven
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (12) : 1484 - 1495
  • [3] Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns
    Kraus, Riccardo D.
    Espuelas, Catharina
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Sailer, Irena
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (05) : 537 - 547
  • [4] Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study
    Vigolo, P
    Givani, A
    Majzoub, Z
    Cordioli, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2004, 19 (02) : 260 - 265
  • [5] A TECHNIQUE FOR FABRICATING SINGLE SCREW-RETAINED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED INTERIM CROWNS IN CONJUNCTION WITH IMPLANT SURGERY
    McRory, M. Eric
    Cagna, David R.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (06): : 455 - 459
  • [6] A 7.5-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained one-piece zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns
    Kraus, Riccardo D.
    Hjerppe, Jenni
    Naenni, Nadja
    Balmer, Marc
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (12) : 1669 - 1675
  • [7] Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 10-year randomised controlled trial
    Vigolo, Paolo
    Mutinelli, Sabrina
    Givani, Andrea
    Stellini, Edoardo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 5 (04) : 355 - 364
  • [8] Peri-implant and esthetic outcomes of cemented and screw-retained crowns using zirconia abutments in single implant-supported restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dini, Caroline
    Borges, Guilherme Almeida
    Costa, Raphael Cavalcante
    Magno, Marcela Barauna
    Maia, Lucianne Cople
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (10) : 1143 - 1158
  • [9] Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results
    Cantner, Friederike
    Cacaci, Claudio
    Muecke, Thomas
    Randelzhofer, Peter
    Hajto, Jan
    Beuer, Florian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (12) : 4301 - 4309
  • [10] Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results
    Friederike Cantner
    Claudio Cacaci
    Thomas Mücke
    Peter Randelzhofer
    Jan Hajtó
    Florian Beuer
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 4301 - 4309