Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke The NICHE Trial

被引:125
作者
Harvey, Richard L. [1 ]
Edwards, Dylan [2 ]
Dunning, Kari [3 ]
Fregni, Felipe [4 ]
Stein, Joel [5 ]
Laine, Jarmo [6 ]
Rogers, Lynn M. [1 ]
Vox, Ford [7 ]
Durand-Sanchez, Ana [8 ]
Bockbrader, Marcia [9 ]
Goldstein, Larry B. [10 ]
Francisco, Gerard E. [11 ]
Kinney, Carolyn L. [12 ]
Liu, Charles Y. [13 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Neurol, Burke Neurol Inst, White Plains, NY USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Rehabil Exercise & Nutr Sci, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil & Regenerat Med, New York, NY USA
[6] Nexstim Corp, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Shepherd Ctr, Clin Res, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] TIRR Mem Herrmann, Baylor Coll Med, Phys Med & Rehabil, Houston, TX USA
[9] Ohio State Univ, Phys Med & Rehabil, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[10] Univ Kentucky, Kentucky Neurosci Inst, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[11] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, TIRR Mem Herrmann, Phys Med & Rehabil, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[12] Mayo Clin Hosp, Phys Med & Rehabil, Mayo Clin Arizona, Phoenix, AZ USA
[13] Rancho Los Amigos Natl Rehabil Ctr, USC Neurorestorat Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
motor cortex; neuronal plasticity; rehabilitation; stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation; FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT; BRAIN-STIMULATION; REORGANIZATION; EXCITABILITY; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; HAND;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020607
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-We aimed to determine whether low-frequency electric field navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to noninjured motor cortex versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation avoiding motor cortex could improve arm motor function in hemiplegic stroke patients when combined with motor training. Methods-Twelve outpatient US rehabilitation centers enrolled participants between May 2014 and December 2015. We delivered 1 Hz active or sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to noninjured motor cortex before each of eighteen 60-minute therapy sessions over a 6-week period, with outcomes measured at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after end of treatment. The primary end point was the percentage of participants improving >= 5 points on upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score 6 months after end of treatment. Secondary analyses assessed changes on the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer and Action Research Arm Test and Wolf Motor Function Test and safety. Results-Of 199 participants, 167 completed treatment and follow-up because of early discontinuation of data collection. Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer gains were significant for experimental (P<0.001) and sham groups (P<0.001). Sixty-seven percent of the experimental group (95% CI, 58%-75%) and 65% of sham group (95% CI, 52%-76%) improved >= 5 points on 6-month upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (P=0.76). There was also no difference between experimental and sham groups in the Action Research Ann Test (P=0.80) or the Wolf Motor Function Test (P=0.55). A total of 26 serious adverse events occurred in 18 participants, with none related to the study or device, and with no difference between groups. Conclusions-Among patients 3 to 12 months poststroke, goal-oriented motor rehabilitation improved motor function 6 months after end of treatment. There was no difference between the active and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation trial arms.
引用
收藏
页码:2138 / 2146
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Adeyemo Bamidele O, 2012, Front Psychiatry, V3, P88, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00088
[2]   Neuronavigation Increases the Physiologic and Behavioral Effects of Low-Frequency rTMS of Primary Motor Cortex in Healthy Subjects [J].
Bashir, S. ;
Edwards, D. ;
Pascual-Leone, A. .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (01) :54-64
[3]  
BERGLUND K, 1986, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V18, P155
[4]   Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke [J].
Bütefisch, CM ;
Netz, J ;
Wessling, M ;
Seitz, RJ ;
Hömberg, V .
BRAIN, 2003, 126 :470-481
[5]   Proportional Recovery After Stroke Depends on Corticomotor Integrity [J].
Byblow, Winston D. ;
Stinear, Cathy M. ;
Barber, P. Alan ;
Petoe, Matthew A. ;
Ackerley, Suzanne J. .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 78 (06) :848-859
[6]  
Carey JR, 2006, RESTOR NEUROL NEUROS, V24, P191
[7]   Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area:: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Delvaux, V ;
Alagona, G ;
Gérard, P ;
De Pasqua, V ;
Pennisi, G ;
de Noordhout, AM .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (07) :1217-1225
[8]   RELIABILITY OF THE FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT OF SENSORIMOTOR RECOVERY FOLLOWING CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT [J].
DUNCAN, PW ;
PROPST, M ;
NELSON, SG .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (10) :1606-1610
[9]   New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation [J].
Edwardson, M. A. ;
Lucas, T. H. ;
Carey, J. R. ;
Fetz, E. E. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 224 (03) :335-358
[10]   Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1Hz and 5Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke [J].
Emara, T. H. ;
Moustafa, R. R. ;
ElNahas, N. M. ;
ElGanzoury, A. M. ;
Abdo, T. A. ;
Mohamed, S. A. ;
ElEtribi, M. A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 17 (09) :1203-1209