Nitrogen uptake and remobilization in maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence

被引:69
作者
Mi, GH [1 ]
Liu, JA [1 ]
Chen, FJ [1 ]
Zhang, FS [1 ]
Cui, ZL [1 ]
Liu, XS [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Dept Plant Nutr, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
genotype; maize; nitrogen uptake; remobilization;
D O I
10.1081/PLN-120016507
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important cereal crop with multiple uses in the world. Stay-green hybrids have been developed because of their higher productivity. Few studies have been conducted to evaluate the influence of nitrogen (N) levels on N uptake, remobilization, grain yield and N concentration in stay-green hybrids compared to senescent ones. Field studies were undertaken in P.R. China on an Ustochrepts soil to determine the effects of N levels and hybrids differing in leaf senescence on grain yield and N concentration, N uptake, remobilization, and residual in vegetative tissues in 1996 and 1997. The stay-green hybrid ND 108 had greater yields than TK5 (intermediate senescing) and ZD 120 (fast senescing) under both high (225kgNha(-1)) and low N (0 in -1997 or 45kgNha(-1) in 1996, respectively) supply. ND108 took up more N than the two other hybrids. Grain N concentration of ND108 did not decrease by low N significantly, excepting the experiment sown in the summer of 1996, when post-silking N uptake was reduced greatly by the shortened grain filling duration. Nitrogen remobilization efficiency in vegetative tissue was higher in senescent hybrids ZD120 than ND108. Nitrogen retained in the stover at harvest was higher in ND 108, which can lead to a deficit of soil N for the next crop if the stover is not returned into soil. It was suggested that, though stay-green hybrids have been developed for high N conditions, they have advantages over senescent hybrids also under N limited conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 247
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   NITROGEN FERTILITY EFFECTS ON ACCUMULATION, REMOBILIZATION, AND PARTITIONING OF N AND DRY-MATTER IN CORN GENOTYPES DIFFERING IN PROLIFICACY [J].
ANDERSON, EL ;
KAMPRATH, EJ ;
MOLL, RH .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (03) :397-404
[2]  
Dai J.R., 1998, Crop J., V5, P6
[3]  
Hageman R.H., 1986, REGULATION CARBON NI, P105
[4]  
Li D.-H., 2000, CROPS, V5, P1
[5]  
Liu L, 1998, J IRON STEEL RES INT, V5, P1
[6]   Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence [J].
Ma, BL ;
Dwyer, LM .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1998, 199 (02) :283-291
[7]  
MOLL RH, 1994, CROP SCI, V34, P1994
[8]   YIELD COMPONENTS AND NITROGEN PARTITIONING OF MAIZE IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN BEFORE AND AFTER ANTHESIS [J].
PEARSON, CJ ;
JACOBS, BC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1987, 38 (06) :1001-1009
[9]   Source: sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize: II. Nitrogen metabolism during grain filling [J].
Rajcan, I ;
Tollenaar, M .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 60 (03) :255-265
[10]   GRAIN PROTEIN ACCUMULATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAF NITRATE REDUCTASE AND PROTEASE ACTIVITIES DURING GRAIN DEVELOPMENT IN MAIZE (ZEA-MAYS-L) .1. VARIATION BETWEEN GENOTYPES [J].
REED, AJ ;
BELOW, FE ;
HAGEMAN, RH .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 66 (01) :164-170