Point-of-care versus central testing of hemoglobin during large volume blood transfusion

被引:10
作者
Herman, Justin [1 ]
Park, Brian [2 ]
Awsare, Bharat [1 ]
West, Frances [1 ]
Crittendon, Denine [3 ]
Evans, Lilah [4 ]
Harach, Mary [5 ]
Karp, Julie [5 ]
Peedin, Alexis [5 ]
LaNoue, Marianna [3 ]
Goldsmith, Barbara [4 ]
Warnick, Eugene [6 ]
Baram, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Pulm & Crit Care Med, 834 Walnut St,Suite 650, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 1025 Walnut St,Room 805, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sch Populat Hlth, 901 Walnut St,10th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, 130 South 9th St,Room 2109, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Blood Bank & Transfus Med, 111 South 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, 1025 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
Point-of-care lab testing; Massive transfusion protocol; Hemoglobin; Bleeding; Hemorrhage; Transfusion; HEMATOCRIT;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-019-0916-2
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Point-of-care (POC) hemoglobin testing has the potential to revolutionize massive transfusion strategies. No prior studies have compared POC and central laboratory testing of hemoglobin in patients undergoing massive transfusions. Methods We retrospectively compared the results of our point-of-care hemoglobin test (EPOC (R)) to our core laboratory complete blood count (CBC) hemoglobin test (Sysmex XE-5000 (TM)) in patients undergoing massive transfusion protocols (MTP) for hemorrhage. One hundred seventy paired samples from 90 patients for whom MTP was activated were collected at a single, tertiary care hospital between 10/2011 and 10/2017. Patients had both an EPOC (R) and CBC hemoglobin performed within 30 min of each other during the MTP. We assessed the accuracy of EPOC (R) hemoglobin testing using two variables: interchangeability and clinically significant differences from the CBC. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) proficiency testing criteria defined interchangeability for measurements. Clinically significant differences between the tests were defined by an expert panel. We examined whether these relationships changed as a function of the hemoglobin measured by the EPOC (R) and specific patient characteristics. Results Fifty one percent (86 of 170) of paired samples' hemoglobin results had an absolute difference of <= 7 and 73% (124 of 170) fell within +/- 1 g/dL of each other. The mean difference between EPOC (R) and CBC hemoglobin had a bias of - 0.268 g/dL (p = 0.002). When the EPOC (R) hemoglobin was < 7 g/dL, 30% of the hemoglobin values were within +/- 7, and 57% were within +/- 1 g/dL. When the measured EPOC (R) hemoglobin was >= 7 g/dL, 55% of the EPOC (R) and CBC hemoglobin values were within +/- 7, and 76% were within +/- 1 g/dL. EPOC (R) and CBC hemoglobin values that were within +/- 1 g/dL varied by patient population: 77% for cardiac surgery, 58% for general surgery, and 72% for non-surgical patients. Conclusions The EPOC (R) device had minor negative bias, was not interchangeable with the CBC hemoglobin, and was less reliable when the EPOC (R) value was < 7 g/dL. Clinicians must consider speed versus accuracy, and should check a CBC within 30 min as confirmation when the EPOC (R) hemoglobin is < 7 g/dL until further prospective trials are performed in this population.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Point-of-Care Versus Central Laboratory Measurements of Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Glucose, Bicarbonate and Electrolytes: A Prospective Observational Study in Critically Ill Patients [J].
Allardet-Servent, Jerome ;
Lebsir, Melissa ;
Dubroca, Christian ;
Fabrigoule, Martine ;
Jordana, Sylvie ;
Signouret, Thomas ;
Castanier, Matthias ;
Thomas, Guillemette ;
Soundaravelou, Rettinavelou ;
Lepidi, Anne ;
Delapierre, Laurence ;
Penaranda, Guillaume ;
Halfon, Philippe ;
Seghboyan, Jean-Marie .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01)
[2]  
American College of Surgeons, 2008, ATLS ADV TRAUM LIF S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, AUT HEM AN XE 5000 I
[4]  
[Anonymous], CLIN HEMATOLOGY THEO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, FED REG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1980, GRADWOHLS CLIN LAB M
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SYST MAN
[8]   Evaluation of low red blood cell mean corpuscular volume in an apheresis donor population [J].
Bryant, Barbara J. ;
Hopkins, Julie A. ;
Arceo, Sarah M. ;
Leitman, Susan F. .
TRANSFUSION, 2009, 49 (09) :1971-1976
[9]   Analytical evaluation of the epoc® point-of-care blood analysis system in cardiopulmonary bypass patients [J].
Chen, Jianing ;
Gorman, Monique ;
O'Reilly, Bill ;
Chen, Yu .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 49 (09) :708-712
[10]  
Connelly S, 2008, ENVIRON POLIT, V17, P175