Deep convolutional neural network for mixed random impulse and Gaussian noise reduction in digital images

被引:5
作者
Mafi, Mehdi [1 ]
Izquierdo, Walter [1 ]
Martin, Harold [1 ]
Cabrerizo, Mercedes [1 ]
Adjouadi, Malek [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Ctr Adv Technol & Educ, Miami, FL 33199 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
image denoising; Gaussian noise; learning (artificial intelligence); filtering theory; convolution; image segmentation; neural nets; image classification; digital images; deep CNN; minimal loss; optimal estimation; known noise mixtures; unknown noise mixtures; different structural metrics; optimal denoising results; 20-layer network; additional; 12; images; CNN-based approach; convolutional neural network; mixed random impulse; Gaussian noise reduction; batch normalisation; mixed impulse; REMOVAL ALGORITHM; SPARSE; CLASSIFICATION; RESTORATION; MIXTURE; DOMAIN;
D O I
10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.0931
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study utilises a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) implementing regularisation and batch normalisation for the removal of mixed, random, impulse, and Gaussian noise of various levels from digital images. This deep CNN achieves minimal loss of detail and yet yields an optimal estimation of structural metrics when dealing with both known and unknown noise mixtures. Moreover, a comprehensive comparison of denoising filters through the use of different structural metrics is provided to highlight the merits of the proposed approach. Optimal denoising results were obtained by using a 20-layer network with 40 x 40 patches trained on 400 180 x 180 images from the Berkeley segmentation data set (BSD) and tested on the BSD100 data set and an additional 12 images of general interest to the research community. The comparative results provide credence to the merits of the proposed filter and the comprehensive assessment of results highlights the novelty and performance of this CNN-based approach.
引用
收藏
页码:3791 / 3801
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Aher R.P., 2012, P IEEE INT C SIGN PR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 25 INT C NEUR INF
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Tiny ImageNet Visual Recognition Challenge., DOI DOI 10.1109/ICCV.2015.123
[5]  
Arnal J., 2013, IEEE INT C SIGN PROC
[6]  
Bovik A.C., 2000, HDB IMAGE VIDEO PROC
[7]   A non-local algorithm for image denoising [J].
Buades, A ;
Coll, B ;
Morel, JM .
2005 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :60-65
[8]  
Burger HC, 2012, PROC CVPR IEEE, P2392, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247952
[9]  
Cai JF, 2008, INVERSE PROBL IMAG, V2, P187
[10]   Fast Two-Phase Image Deblurring Under Impulse Noise [J].
Cai, Jian-Feng ;
Chan, Raymond H. ;
Nikolova, Mila .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL IMAGING AND VISION, 2010, 36 (01) :46-53