Detection of flood influence criteria in ungauged basins on a combined Delphi-AHP approach

被引:23
作者
Boulomytis, V. T. G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zuffo, A. C. [2 ]
Imteaz, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Urban Design, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Fed Inst Sci Educ & Technol Sao Paulo IFSP, Dept Civil Construct, Campus Caraguatatuba, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Decision analysis; Decision-making process; Multiple criteria analysis; Criteria judgement scale; Flood susceptibility evaluation; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; RISK-MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.orp.2019.100116
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The prediction of areas susceptible to floods is essential for the protection of the population living in vulnerable conditions. It is only possible when the main contributing factors are pointed out. It is very challenging for hydrologists to run models when the input data are not representative. Alternative methods, such as the multicriteria decision analysis, represent a good solution for the simulation of future scenarios. However, the criteria selection affects the accuracy of the further modelling process. The purpose of the current study was to select and attribute scores to all the feasible criteria that contribute to flood susceptibility in the coastal plains of the Juqueriquere river basin, Brazil. First, the Delphi method was employed in the expert-based survey. Then, the root square judgement scale was adapted to an extended Analytic Hierarchy Process approach for the final allocation of priority values. Even though the initially ranked scores were within a limited range, the proposed methodology could adequately redistribute these scores in the final scale from 1 to 10. The consistency and sensitivity analyses revealed that the findings were coherent, providing the weight vector of the achievable criteria that affect the flood likelihood in the study area.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Boulomytis VTG, 2015, WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2015: FLOODS, DROUGHTS, AND ECOSYSTEMS, P1248
[2]  
Boulomytis VTG, 2015, REV BRASILEIRA GESTA, V11, P31
[3]   The spatial framework for weight sensitivity analysis in AHP-based multi-criteria decision making [J].
Chen, Yun ;
Yu, Jia ;
Khan, Shahbaz .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 48 :129-140
[4]   Multicriteria decision analysis in water resources management:: the malnichara channel improvement [J].
Chowdhury, R. K. ;
Rahman, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 5 (02) :195-204
[5]   Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques [J].
Chung, Eun-Sung ;
Lee, Kil Seong .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (03) :1502-1511
[6]  
Souza CRD, 2005, REV BRAS GEOMORFOL, V6, P45
[7]  
Edwards W, 2007, ADVANCES IN DECISION ANALYSIS: FROM FOUNDATIONS TO APPLICATIONS, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511611308
[8]   A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling [J].
Fenicia, Fabrizio ;
Savenije, Hubert H. G. ;
Matgen, Patrick ;
Pfister, Laurent .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (03)
[9]   Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucuman Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis [J].
Fernandez, D. S. ;
Lutz, M. A. .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2010, 111 (1-4) :90-98
[10]   From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and Multi-Attribute Value Theory: An integrated approach for policy support [J].
Ferretti, Valentina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (02) :524-541