Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications

被引：178

作者：

Buscher, Bram ^{[1
,16
,17
]}

Fletcher, Robert ^{[1
]}

Brockington, Dan ^{[2
]}

Sandbrook, Chris ^{[3
,18
]}

Adams, William M. ^{[3
]}

Campbell, Lisa ^{[4
]}

Corson, Catherine ^{[5
]}

Dressler, Wolfram ^{[6
]}

Duffy, Rosaleen ^{[7
]}

Gray, Noella ^{[8
]}

Holmes, George ^{[9
]}

Kelly, Alice ^{[10
]}

Lunstrum, Elizabeth ^{[11
]}

Ramutsindela, Maano ^{[12
]}

Shanker, Kartik ^{[13
,14
,15
]}

机构：

[1] Wageningen Univ, Sociol Dev & Change, Wageningen, Netherlands

[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Inst Int Dev, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England

[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Cambridge, MA USA

[4] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA

[5] Mt Holyoke Coll, S Hadley, MA 01075 USA

[6] Univ Melbourne, Sch Geog, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

[7] Univ London, SOAS, Dept Dev Studies, London, England

[8] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog, Guelph, ON, Canada

[9] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England

[10] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

[11] York Univ, Dept Geog, N York, ON, Canada

[12] Univ Cape Town, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, Cape Town, South Africa

[13] Ashoka Trust Res Ecol & Environm, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

[14] Dakshin Fdn, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

[15] Indian Inst Sci, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

[16] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Geog Environm Management & Energy Studies, Johannesburg, South Africa

[17] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Sociol & Social Anthropol, Stellenbosch, South Africa

[18] World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, United Nations Environm Programme, Cambridge, England

来源：

ORYX | 2017年 / 51卷 / 03期

关键词：

Biodiversity; economy; Half-Earth; inequality; protected area; PROTECTED AREAS; BIODIVERSITY; INEQUALITY;

D O I：

10.1017/S0030605316001228

中图分类号：

X176 [生物多样性保护];

学科分类号：

090705 ;

摘要：

We question whether the increasingly popular, radical idea of turning half the Earth into a network of protected areas is either feasible or just. We argue that this Half-Earth plan would have widespread negative consequences for human populations and would not meet its conservation objectives. It offers no agenda for managing biodiversity within a human half of Earth. We call instead for alternative radical action that is both more effective and more equitable, focused directly on the main drivers of biodiversity loss by shifting the global economy from its current foundation in growth while simultaneously redressing inequality.

引用

页码：407 / 410

页数：4

共 23 条

[21]

Wilkinson RichardG., 2010, The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better

[22]

Wilson E.O., 2016, Half-Earth

[23]

Wuerthner George et al.., 2015, Protecting the Wild: Parks and Wilderness, the Foundation for Conservation

← 1 2 3 →