The effects of disturbance and enemy exclusion on performance of an invasive species, common ragweed, in its native range

被引:31
|
作者
MacDonald, A. Andrew M. [1 ]
Kotanen, Peter M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ambrosia artemisiifolia; Biological invasions; Disturbance; Enemy Release Hypothesis; Natural enemies; AMBROSIA-ARTEMISIIFOLIA L; OPHRAELLA COLEOPTERA; PLANT INVASIONS; RELEASE; SEED; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; CHRYSOMELIDAE; ESTABLISHMENT; ASSOCIATIONS; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-009-1557-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) is an abundant weed in its native North America, despite supporting a wide range of natural enemies. Here, we tested whether these enemies have significant impacts on the performance of this plant in its native range. We excluded enemies from the three principal life-history stages (seed, seedling, and adult) of this annual in a series of field experiments; at the adult stage, we also manipulated soil disturbance and conspecific density. We then measured the consequences of these treatments for growth, survival, and reproduction. Excluding fungi and vertebrate granivores from seeds on the soil surface did not increase germination relative to control plots. Seedling survivorship was only slightly increased by the exclusion of molluscs and other herbivores. Insecticide reduced damage to leaves of adult plants, but did not improve growth or reproduction. Growth and survivorship of adults were strongly increased by disturbance, while higher conspecific density reduced performance in disturbed plots. These results indicate ragweed is insensitive to attack by many of its natural enemies, helping to explain its native-range success. In addition, they suggest that even though ragweed lost most of its insect folivores while invading Europe, escape from these enemies is unlikely to have provided a significant demographic advantage; instead, disturbance is likely to have been a much more important factor in its invasion. Escape from enemies should not be assumed to explain the success of exotic species unless improved performance also can be demonstrated; native-range studies can help achieve this goal.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 986
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate outweighs native vs. nonnative range-effects for genetics and common garden performance of a cosmopolitan weed
    Rosche, Christoph
    Hensen, Isabell
    Schaar, Adrian
    Zehra, Uzma
    Jasieniuk, Marie
    Callaway, Ragan M.
    Khasa, Damase P.
    Al-Gharaibeh, Mohammad M.
    Lekberg, Ylva
    Nagy, David U.
    Pal, Robert W.
    Okada, Miki
    Schrieber, Karin
    Turner, Kathryn G.
    Lachmuth, Susanne
    Erst, Andrey
    Tsunoda, Tomonori
    Sheng, Min
    Schmidt, Robin
    Peng, Yanling
    Luo, Wenbo
    Jaeschke, Yun
    Reshi, Zafar A.
    Shah, Manzoor A.
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2019, 89 (04)
  • [32] What controls the population dynamics of the invasive thistle Carduus nutans in its native range?
    Jongejans, Eelke
    Sheppard, Andy W.
    Shea, Katriona
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (05) : 877 - 886
  • [33] Habitat provided by native species facilitates higher abundances of an invader in its introduced compared to native range
    Gribben, Paul E.
    Poore, Alistair G. B.
    Thomsen, Mads S.
    Quesey, Phoebe
    Weschke, Emma
    Wright, Jeffrey T.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [34] Plant-soil interactions in the native range of two congeneric species with contrasting invasive success
    Florianova, Anna
    Hanzelkova, Vera
    Drtinova, Lucie
    Pankova, Hana
    Cajthaml, Tomas
    Munzbergova, Zuzana
    OECOLOGIA, 2023, 201 (02) : 461 - 477
  • [35] Enhanced frugivory on invasive Silene latifolia in its native range due to increased oviposition
    Elzinga, Jelmer A.
    Bernasconi, Giorgina
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2009, 97 (05) : 1010 - 1019
  • [36] Preadapted for invasiveness: do species traits or their plastic response to shading differ between invasive and non-invasive plant species in their native range?
    van Kleunen, Mark
    Schlaepfer, Daniel R.
    Glaettli, Melanie
    Fischer, Markus
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2011, 38 (07) : 1294 - 1304
  • [37] Effects of macroalgal identity on epifaunal assemblages: native species versus the invasive species Sargassum muticum
    Gestoso, Ignacio
    Olabarria, Celia
    Troncoso, Jesus S.
    HELGOLAND MARINE RESEARCH, 2012, 66 (02) : 159 - 166
  • [38] Climatic and soil characteristics account for the genetic structure of the invasive cactus moth Cactoblastis cactorum, in its native range in Argentina
    Andraca-Gomez, Guadalupe
    Ordano, Mariano
    Noriega, Andres Lira-
    Osorio-Olvera, Luis
    Dominguez, Cesar A.
    Fornoni, Juan
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [39] Local performance of six clonal alien species differs between native and invasive regions in Germany and New Zealand
    Beckmann, Michael
    Bruelheide, Helge
    Erfmeier, Alexandra
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 39 (04) : 378 - 387
  • [40] Species distribution models of the Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii, Diptera: Drosophilidae) in its native and invasive range reveal an ecological niche shift
    Orsted, Iben Vejrum
    Orsted, Michael
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (02) : 423 - 435