The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties

被引:739
作者
Gobbens, Robbert J. J. [1 ,2 ]
van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
Luijkx, Katrien G. [1 ]
Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th. [3 ,4 ]
Schols, Jos M. G. A. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Fac Behav & Social Sci, Dept Tranzo Acad Ctr Transformat Care & Welf, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Rotterdam Univ Appl Sci, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Fac Behav & Social Sci, Dept Methodol & Stat, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Avans Univ Appl Sci, Breda, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Frailty; validity; reliability; older people; measurement instrument; DISABILITY; VALIDITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; INSTRUMENT; INJURIES; FALLS; SCALE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Community-based. Participants: Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements: The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up & Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results: The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains. (J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010; 11: 344-355)
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 355
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alberts M, 1997, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V141, P1526
[2]   The yield, reliability, and validity of a postal survey for screening community-dwelling older people [J].
Alessi, CA ;
Josephson, KR ;
Harker, JO ;
Pietruszka, FM ;
Hoyl, MT ;
Rubenstein, LZ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (02) :194-202
[3]  
Aminzadeh F., 2002, Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, V12, P82
[4]  
[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[5]  
Bergman H., 2004, Gerontologie et Societe, V109, P15, DOI [10.3917/gs.109.0015, DOI 10.3917/GS.109.0015]
[6]   Frailty: An emerging research and clinical paradigm - Issues and controversies [J].
Bergman, Howard ;
Ferrucci, Luigi ;
Guralnik, Jack ;
Hogan, David B. ;
Hummel, Silvia ;
Karunananthan, Sathya ;
Wolfson, Christina .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 62 (07) :731-737
[7]   Evaluation of a self-report screening instrument to predict frailty outcomes in aging populations [J].
Brody, KK ;
Johnson, RE ;
Ried, LD .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1997, 37 (02) :182-191
[8]   Physical and performance measures for the identification of mild to moderate frailty [J].
Brown, M ;
Sinacore, DR ;
Binder, EF ;
Kohrt, WM .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 55 (06) :M350-M355
[9]   Unstable disability and the fluctuations of frailty [J].
Campbell, AJ ;
Buchner, DM .
AGE AND AGEING, 1997, 26 (04) :315-318
[10]  
De Jong Gierveld J., 1999, Manual of the loneliness scale