Individual welfare, social deprivation and income taxation

被引:18
作者
Chakravarty, SR
Moyes, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montesquieu Bordeaux 9, CNRS, IDEP, F-33608 Pessac, France
[2] Univ Montesquieu Bordeaux 9, GRAPE, F-33608 Pessac, France
[3] Indian Stat Inst, Kolkata 700035, W Bengal, India
关键词
welfarism; taxation; progressivity; deprivation; individual welfare;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-002-0276-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a homogeneous framework where individuals can only be distinguished on the basis of their incomes, we examine the incidence of taxation on the amount of deprivation felt in the society. We conceive deprivation in terms of utility or well-being rather than just in terms of income and we measure it by comparing the deprivation profiles arising in the different situations. We identify the restrictions to be imposed on the utility function which guarantee that a more progressive system of taxes always results in less social deprivation. We show that, in general, it is not possible to get an equivalence and realize a social improvement in terms of social deprivation by substituting a more progressive system of taxes for a less progressive one.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 869
页数:27
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ACZEL J, 1966, LECT FUNCTIONAL EQUA
[2]   MEASUREMENT OF INCOME INEQUALITY - EXPERIMENTAL TEST BY QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
AMIEL, Y ;
COWELL, FA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1992, 47 (01) :3-26
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, PUBLIC EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], KEIO EC STUD
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF INEQUALITY [J].
ATKINSON, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1970, 2 (03) :244-263
[6]  
ATKINSON AB, 1987, ARROW FDN THEORY EC
[7]  
Avriel M., 2003, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
[8]  
Ballano C., 1993, REV ESP EC, P233
[9]   INTERMEDIATE INEQUALITY - CONCEPTS, INDEXES, AND WELFARE IMPLICATIONS [J].
BOSSERT, W ;
PFINGSTEN, A .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1990, 19 (02) :117-134
[10]   Lorenz domination, utilitarian deprivation rule and equal sacrifice principle [J].
Chakravarty, SR ;
Mukherjee, D .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 1998, 66 (05) :521-531