Moving Stroke Rehabilitation Research Evidence into Clinical Practice: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations From the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

被引:11
作者
Eng, Janice J. [1 ]
Bird, Marie-Louise [1 ,2 ]
Godecke, Erin [3 ]
Hoffmann, Tammy C. [4 ]
Laurin, Carole
Olaoye, Olumide A. [5 ]
Solomon, John [6 ]
Teasell, Robert [7 ,8 ]
Watkins, Caroline L. [9 ,10 ]
Walker, Marion F. [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Launceston, Tas, Australia
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Bond Univ, Ctr Res Evidence Based Practice, Gold Coast, Australia
[5] Obafemi Awolowo Univ, Dept Med Rehabil, Ife, Nigeria
[6] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Manipal, Karnataka, India
[7] Univ Western Ontario, Lawson Hlth Res Inst, Parkwood Inst Res, London, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Cent Lancashire, Preston, Lancs, England
[10] Australian Catholic Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Nottingham, England
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
knowledge translation; implementation; stroke; rehabilitation; recovery; consensus; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/1545968319886485
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Moving research evidence to practice can take years, if not decades, which denies stroke patients and families from receiving the best care. We present the results of an international consensus process prioritizing what research evidence to implement into stroke rehabilitation practice to have maximal impact. An international 10-member Knowledge Translation Working Group collaborated over a six-month period via videoconferences and a two-day face-to-face meeting. The process was informed from surveys received from 112 consumers/family members and 502 health care providers in over 28 countries, as well as from an international advisory of 20 representatives from 13 countries. From this consensus process, five of the nine identified priorities relate to service delivery (interdisciplinary care, screening and assessment, clinical practice guidelines, intensity, family support) and are generally feasible to implement or improve upon today. Readily available website resources are identified to help health care providers harness the necessary means to implement existing knowledge and solutions to improve service delivery. The remaining four priorities relate to system issues (access to services, transitions in care) and resources (equipment/technology, staffing) and are acknowledged to be more difficult to implement. We recommend that health care providers, managers, and organizations determine whether the priorities we identified are gaps in their local practice, and if so, consider implementation solutions to address them to improve the quality of lives of people living with stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 942
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Where to Build the Bridge Between Evidence and Practice?: Results of an International Workshop to Prioritize Knowledge Translation Activities in Traumatic Brain Injury Care [J].
Bayley, Mark Theodore ;
Teasell, Robert William ;
Wolfe, Dalton Louis ;
Gruen, Russell Lindsay ;
Eng, Janice Jennifer ;
Ghajar, Jamshid ;
Tavender, Emma ;
Kua, Ailene ;
Bragge, Peter .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2014, 29 (04) :268-276
[2]   Setting the scene for the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable [J].
Bernhardt, Julie ;
Borschmann, Karen N. ;
Kwakkel, Gert ;
Burridge, Jane H. ;
Eng, Janice J. ;
Walker, Marion F. ;
Bird, Marie-Louise ;
Cramer, Steven C. ;
Hayward, Kathryn S. ;
O'Sullivan, Michael J. ;
Clarkson, Andrew N. ;
Corbett, Dale ;
O'Sullivan, Michael ;
Clarkson, Andrew ;
Kwaldcel, Gert ;
Burridge, Jane ;
VanWegen, Erwin ;
Cramer, Steve ;
Eng, Janice ;
Walker, Marion .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2019, 14 (05) :450-456
[3]   Moving stroke rehabilitation evidence into practice: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bird, Marie-Louise ;
Miller, Tiev ;
Connell, Louise A. ;
Eng, Janice J. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 33 (10) :1586-1595
[4]   Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial [J].
Boivin, Antoine ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Lacombe, Real ;
Burgers, Jako ;
Grol, Richard .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
[5]   The association between delays in screening for and assessing dysphagia after acute stroke, and the risk of stroke-associated pneumonia [J].
Bray, Benjamin D. ;
Smith, Craig J. ;
Cloud, Geoffrey C. ;
Enderby, Pam ;
James, Martin ;
Paley, Lizz ;
Tyrrell, Pippa J. ;
Wolfe, Charles D. A. ;
Rudd, Anthony G. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 88 (01) :25-30
[6]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation, 2016, KNOWL TRANSL
[7]   Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care [J].
Crawford, MJ ;
Rutter, D ;
Manley, C ;
Weaver, T ;
Bhui, K ;
Fulop, N ;
Tyrer, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7375) :1263-1265
[8]   Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation [J].
Graham, Ian D. ;
Tetroe, Jacqueline .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (11) :936-941
[9]   Impact of delay in early swallow screening on pneumonia, length of stay in hospital, disability and mortality in acute stroke patients [J].
Han, Thang S. ;
Lean, Michael E. J. ;
Fluck, David ;
Affley, Brendan ;
Gulli, Giosue ;
Patel, Tasmin ;
Barrett, Christopher ;
Kakar, Puneet ;
Sharma, Sapna ;
Sharma, Pankaj .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 72 (11) :1548-1554
[10]  
Hanney S., 2003, Health Research Policy and Systems, V1, P1