Force-Velocity-Power Assessment in Semiprofessional Rugby Union Players

被引:15
作者
McMaster, Daniel T. [1 ,2 ]
Gill, Nicholas D. [1 ,2 ]
Cronin, John B. [1 ,3 ]
McGuigan, Michael R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, North Shore City, New Zealand
[2] New Zealand Rugby Union, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Exercise, Biomed & Hlth Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
kinematics; countermovement; concentric-only; kinetics; bench throw; COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYERS; UPPER-BODY MOVEMENTS; MAXIMAL STRENGTH; MUSCLE ACTIVATION; LEAGUE PLAYERS; BENCH THROWS; JUMP SQUATS; PERFORMANCE; OUTPUT; LOAD;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1da46
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
McMaster, DT, Gill, N, Cronin, J, and McGuigan, M. Force-velocity-power assessment in semiprofessional rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 30(4): 1118-1126, 2016-There is a constant and necessary evolution of training and assessment methods in the elite contact sports; as is required to continually improve the physical qualities of these respective athletes to match the growing sport and position-specific performance demands. Our aim was to examine the differences between ballistic upper body performance profiles and maximum upper body strength of elite rugby union forwards and backs. Twenty semiprofessional male rugby union players (age = 21.1 +/- 3.0 years; mass = 94.9 +/- 9.7 kg) were assessed for maximum bench press strength (1RM bench press = 121.3 +/- 21.8 kg) and maximum throw power (Pmax), force (Fmax), and velocity ((V) over dotmax) from an incremental relative load testing protocol (15, 30, 45, 60, and 75% 1RM). Player rankings were also included to identify individual strength and weaknesses. The forwards were moderately stronger (effect size [ES] = 0.96; p = 0.01), produced significantly greater Fmax (ES = 1.17-1.41; p = 0.01) and were more powerful (ES = 0.57-0.64; p < 0.43) than the backs. (V) over dotmax differences were trivial to small (ES = -0.32 to -0.65; p > 0.15). There were inherent differences in strength and Fmax between the forwards and backs most likely because of the physical demands of these respective positions. Improvements in upper body strength may in turn improve ballistic force and power production, but not necessarily velocity capabilities. From the Fmax and (V) over dotmax observations, the forwards seem to be more force dominant and the backs more velocity dominant. Pmax, Fmax, and (V) over dotmax may be used to highlight proficient and deficient areas in ballistic upper body performance; the individual rankings could be further used to identify and possibly rectify individual deficiencies.
引用
收藏
页码:1118 / 1126
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   CHANGES IN STRENGTH, POWER, AND STEROID HORMONES DURING A PROFESSIONAL RUGBY UNION COMPETITION [J].
Argus, Christos K. ;
Gill, Nicholas D. ;
Keogh, Justin W. L. ;
Hopkins, Will G. ;
Beaven, C. Martyn .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2009, 23 (05) :1583-1592
[2]  
Baker D, 1999, J STRENGTH COND RES, V13, P230
[3]  
Baker D, 2005, STRENGTH COND J, V27, P24, DOI 10.1519/1533-4295(2005)27[24:MTITEO]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
Baker D, 2001, J STRENGTH COND RES, V15, P92
[6]  
Baker D, 2001, J STRENGTH COND RES, V15, P198
[7]  
Baker D, 2001, J STRENGTH COND RES, V15, P20
[8]  
Baker D, 2001, J STRENGTH COND RES, V15, P172
[9]   Comparison of lower body strength, power, acceleration, speed, agility, and sprint momentum to describe and compare playing rank among professional rugby league players [J].
Baker, Daniel G. ;
Newton, Robert U. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2008, 22 (01) :153-158
[10]  
Baker DG, 2007, J STRENGTH COND RES, V21, P1007