The Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Theory of Measurement

被引:81
作者
Bernasconi, Michele [1 ]
Choirat, Christine [2 ]
Seri, Raffaello [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ca Foscari, Dipartimento Sci Econ & SSE, I-30121 Venice, Italy
[2] Univ Navarra, Sch Econ & Business Management, Dept Quantitat Methods, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[3] Univ Insubria, Dipartimento Econ, I-21100 Varese, Italy
关键词
ratio scales; subjective weighting; decision making; GLOBAL PSYCHOPHYSICAL JUDGMENTS; BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES; EMPIRICAL-EVALUATION; PROSPECT-THEORY; SCALING METHOD; RATIO; MODEL; SUMMATIONS; AHP;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1090.1123
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a decision-making procedure widely used in management for establishing priorities in multicriteria decision problems. Underlying the AHP is the theory of ratio-scale measures developed in psychophysics since the middle of the last century. It is, however, well known that classical ratio-scaling approaches have several problems. We reconsider the AHP in the light of the modern theory of measurement based on the so-called separable representations recently axiomatized in mathematical psychology. We provide various theoretical and empirical results on the extent to which the AHP can be considered a reliable decision-making procedure in terms of the modern theory of subjective measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 711
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT AND PSYCHOPHYSICAL JUDGMENT [J].
ANDERSON, NH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1970, 77 (03) :153-&
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MEASUREMENT PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511490040
[3]   Measurement by subjective estimation: Testing for separable representations [J].
Bernasconi, Michele ;
Choirat, Christine ;
Seri, Raffaello .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 52 (03) :184-201
[4]   SCALE CONVERGENCE AS A CRITERION FOR RESCALING - INFORMATION INTEGRATION WITH DIFFERENCE, RATIO, AND AVERAGING TASKS [J].
BIRNBAUM, MH ;
VEIT, CT .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 15 (01) :7-15
[5]   Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL ;
Wakker, PP .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (11) :1498-1514
[6]   A COMPARISON OF THE EIGENVALUE METHOD AND THE GEOMETRIC MEAN PROCEDURE FOR RATIO SCALING [J].
BUDESCU, DV ;
ZWICK, R ;
RAPOPORT, A .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1986, 10 (01) :69-78
[7]   A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].
CRAWFORD, G ;
WILLIAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405
[8]   A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO SAATY SCALING METHOD FOR PRIORITIES [J].
DEJONG, P .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 28 (04) :467-478
[9]   REMARKS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DYER, JS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (03) :249-258
[10]   Empirical evaluation of axioms fundamental to Stevens's ratio-scaling approach: I. Loudness production [J].
Ellermeier, W ;
Faulhammer, G .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (08) :1505-1511