Effect of infill pattern and infill density at varying part orientation on tensile properties of fused deposition modeling-printed poly-lactic acid part

被引:86
作者
Dave, Harshit K. [1 ]
Patadiya, Naushil H. [1 ]
Prajapati, Ashish R. [1 ]
Rajpurohit, Shilpesh R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Natl Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Surat 395007, Gujarat, India
关键词
Fused deposition modeling (FDM); poly-lactic acid (PLA); part orientation; infill pattern; infill density; tensile strength; fracture surfaces; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PROCESS PARAMETERS; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; IMPACT STRENGTH; PLA; FDM; BEHAVIOR; ABS;
D O I
10.1177/0954406219856383
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Fused deposition modeling is an additive manufacturing process in which successive layers of material are deposited to create a three-dimensional object. It is the most widely used additive manufacturing process because of its ability to make specimen having difficult geometrical shape. However, building end-user functional parts using fused deposition modeling proved to be a challenging task because of a wide variety of processing parameters. In the present paper, a detailed experimental study on open source 3D printer is reported to explore the effect of various fused deposition modeling process parameters viz. part orientation, infill density and infill pattern on tensile properties and modes of failure. Poly-lactic acid filament is used to make 3D specimens. The experimental values of tensile properties are measured and critically analysed. Failure modes under various tests are studied using scanning electron microscopy. Tensile test results indicate that part orientation, infill pattern and infill density significantly affect the tensile strength. It has been observed that parts printed with flat part orientation and concentric pattern exhibit maximum tensile strength. While tensile strength has been increasing with increment in infill density. From the SEM images, it has been found that one of the major causes of failure is weak strength within and between layers for the lower value of infill density.
引用
收藏
页码:1811 / 1827
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[2]   Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: a Design-for-Manufacturing Approach [J].
Alafaghani, Ala'aldin ;
Qattawi, Ala ;
Alrawi, Buraaq ;
Guzman, Arturo .
45TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 45), 2017, 10 :791-803
[3]   Investigating the influence of infill percentage on the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelled ABS parts [J].
Alvarez C, Kenny L. ;
Lagos C, Rodrigo F. ;
Aizpun, Miguel .
INGENIERIA E INVESTIGACION, 2016, 36 (03) :110-116
[4]  
Bagsik A., 2010, Polymeric Materials
[5]   Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection [J].
Chacon, J. M. ;
Caminero, M. A. ;
Garcia-Plaza, E. ;
Nunez, P. J. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2017, 124 :143-157
[6]  
Chua CK, 2010, RAPID PROTOTYPING: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, 3RD EDITION, DOI 10.1142/6665
[7]   Mechanical behaviour of ABS: An experimental study using FDM and injection moulding techniques [J].
Dawoud, Michael ;
Taha, Iman ;
Ebeid, Samy J. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2016, 21 :39-45
[8]   Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost [J].
Durgun, Ismail ;
Ertan, Rukiye .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (03) :228-235
[9]   Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing of Polymer-Metal Hybrid Materials by Fused Deposition Modeling [J].
Fafenrot, Susanna ;
Grimmelsmann, Nils ;
Wortmann, Martin ;
Ehrmann, Andrea .
MATERIALS, 2017, 10 (10)
[10]   Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing [J].
Fernandez-Vicente, Miguel ;
Calle, Wilson ;
Ferrandiz, Santiago ;
Conejero, Andres .
3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2016, 3 (03) :183-192