Long-term comparison of trace organics removal performances between conventional and membrane activated sludge processes

被引:43
|
作者
Zuehlke, S. [1 ]
Duennbier, U.
Lesjean, B.
Gnirss, R.
Buisson, H.
机构
[1] Univ Dortmund, Inst Environm Res, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
[2] Veolia Water, Berlin, Germany
关键词
endocrine-disrupting compounds; pharmaceutical residues; wastewater treatment; membrane bioreactor; steroids;
D O I
10.2175/106143006X111826
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The removal of trace organic compounds through membrane bioreactors (MBR) compared with a conventional wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in a long-term study was investigated. Two MBR pilot plants were operated in parallel to a full-scale WWTP fed with the same municipal raw wastewater. Polar compounds (phenazone-type pharmaceuticals, their metabolites, and carbamazepine) and less polar estrogenic steroids (estradiol, estrone, and ethinylestradiol) were quantified. The removal rate of phenazone, propyphenazone, and formylaminoantipyrine by the conventional WWTP was less than 15%. Significantly higher removal rates (60 to 70%) started to be clearly monitored in the pilot plants after approximately 5 months. Higher removal rates coincided with higher temperatures in the summer. The conventional WWTP removed, on average, more than 90% of the natural steroids estrone and estradiol and approximately 80% of the synthetic ethinylestradiol. Approximately 99% of estradiol and estrone and approximately 95% of ethinylestradiol was eliminated by the MBR processes.
引用
收藏
页码:2480 / 2486
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Modeling Approach between Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes
    Jiang, Tao
    Sin, Guerkan
    Spanjers, Henri
    Nopens, Ingmar
    Kennedy, Maria D.
    van der Meer, Walter
    Futselaar, Harry
    Amy, Gary
    Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2009, 81 (04) : 432 - 440
  • [2] Endocrine disrupting compounds: A comparison of removal between conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactors
    Cases, V.
    Alonso, V.
    Argandona, V.
    Rodriguez, M.
    Prats, D.
    DESALINATION, 2011, 272 (1-3) : 240 - 245
  • [3] Removal of tetrabromobisphenol A by conventional activated sludge, submerged membrane and membrane aerated biofilm reactors
    Potvin, Christopher M.
    Long, Zebo
    Zhou, Hongde
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 89 (10) : 1183 - 1188
  • [4] Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors
    De Wever, H
    Van Roy, S
    Dotremont, C
    Müller, J
    Knepper, T
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (05) : 219 - 225
  • [5] Formation and removal of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes
    Xiaomeng Han
    Zhiwei Wang
    Jinxing Ma
    Junjian Zheng
    Pan Wang
    Zhichao Wu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22 : 12633 - 12643
  • [6] Formation and removal of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes
    Han, Xiaomeng
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Ma, Jinxing
    Zheng, Junjian
    Wang, Pan
    Wu, Zhichao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (16) : 12633 - 12643
  • [7] Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater -: Comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment
    Gonzalez, Susana
    Petrovic, Mira
    Barcelo, Damia
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 67 (02) : 335 - 343
  • [8] Removal of 17-β estradiol from wastewater: comparison between a laboratory scale conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor
    Lopez-Fernandez, R.
    Tavares, F. V. F.
    Gomez, M.
    Irusta, R.
    Le-Clech, P.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (10-12) : 2336 - 2342
  • [9] A plant-wide modelling comparison between membrane bioreactors and conventional activated sludge
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Cosenza, Alida
    Reboucas, Taise Ferreira
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 297
  • [10] Comparison of performances between membrane bioreactor and activated sludge system for the treatment of pulping process wastewaters
    Dufresne, R
    Lavallee, HC
    Lebrun, RE
    Lo, SN
    1996 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE BOOKS 1 AND 2: PARTNERS IN GLOBAL STEWARDSHIP, 1996, : 323 - 330